The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.2196/18399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Design to Support the Development of Inclusive eHealth Tools for Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design

Abstract: Background eHealth can help reduce social health inequalities (SHIs) as much as it can exacerbate them. Taking a co-design approach to the development of eHealth tools has the potential to ensure that these tools are inclusive. Although the importance of involving future users in the development of eHealth tools to reduce SHIs is highlighted in the scientific literature, the challenges associated with their participation question the benefits of this involvement as co-designers in a real-world cont… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To best meet the needs of older veterans, and older adults more generally, future research should utilize qualitative methods and co-design processes to ensure that interventions are solving mental health challenges in usable, meaningful, and engaging ways. Co-design can help address barriers that are specific to older adults (eg, [ 69 ]); ensure that the product is findable, accessible, usable, desirable, credible, useful, and valuable (eg, [ 70 ]); improve the overall quality of the product [ 71 ]; and promote equity and inclusion (eg, [ 72 , 73 ]). More research focused on effective dissemination and implementation strategies is also needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To best meet the needs of older veterans, and older adults more generally, future research should utilize qualitative methods and co-design processes to ensure that interventions are solving mental health challenges in usable, meaningful, and engaging ways. Co-design can help address barriers that are specific to older adults (eg, [ 69 ]); ensure that the product is findable, accessible, usable, desirable, credible, useful, and valuable (eg, [ 70 ]); improve the overall quality of the product [ 71 ]; and promote equity and inclusion (eg, [ 72 , 73 ]). More research focused on effective dissemination and implementation strategies is also needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caregivers include professional as well as family and non-professional ones (Couture et al. , 2018; Latulippe et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participatory, co-design approach to this project ensured that the perspectives of key stakeholders such as primary caregivers of persons with dementia and the Alzheimer’s Society were incorporated into content and program development, which we consider a strength of our project. The value of co-designed programs has been amply demonstrated in the literature, notably in the field of technological support for chronic diseases and/or ailments, given the purposes of our research [ 48 , 49 ]. Despite some challenges that can stem from co-designed programs (eg, time issues can interfere with a fully democratic process [ 49 ]), they remain the gold standard for program development in the field of integrated care [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of co-designed programs has been amply demonstrated in the literature, notably in the field of technological support for chronic diseases and/or ailments, given the purposes of our research [ 48 , 49 ]. Despite some challenges that can stem from co-designed programs (eg, time issues can interfere with a fully democratic process [ 49 ]), they remain the gold standard for program development in the field of integrated care [ 50 ]. The advantages of co-designed support apps such as ours include knowledge cocreation across technical solutions, lived experience, and medical expertise [ 48 ] and the reduction of social health inequalities [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation