Co-design of a stakeholders’ ecosystem: an assessment methodology by linking social network analysis, stakeholder theory and participatory mapping

Abstract

Purpose The need for stakeholder theory has been widely highlighted in the literature to develop solid strategies for a large organization. However, there is still a lack of user-friendly visualization tools and no unique approach exists to identify and engage stakeholders. This paper aims to propose a general methodology to co-design the sustainability ecosystem at the local scale, to explore it and to assess the impact of a large organization within the identified ecosystem. Design/methodology/approach The methodology consists of two main processes: identifying an ontological map of the sustainability topics network and designing the local sustainability stakeholders ecosystem. Both processes are based on a nodes identification phase and a nodes prioritization phase. The identification phase was achieved by engaging 160 citizens, for the topics network and nearly 40 relevant stakeholders, for the stakeholders’ ecosystem, with a collaborative participatory mapping process. The prioritization phase was conducted because of three indicators, i.e. the closeness, the betweenness and the eigenvector centrality. Findings Betweenness centrality results to be the best indicator to assess the importance of a stakeholder with respect to the whole network, while eigenvector centrality highlights the quality of the already engaged stakeholders of an organization, as it mainly depends on the number of links of the first order neighbors. On the contrary, the closeness centrality, when applied to a small network, seems to be not appropriate to assess the centrality of a stakeholder. Research limitations/implications This approach revealed some criticalities in the mapping process, as in the weighting link procedure. Further investigations are needed to generalize the approach to a dynamic one, to allow real-time mapping and to develop a robust interconnection among centrality degrees and the power, interest and legitimacy concept of stakeholder theory. Practical implications Obtained results for a case study, i.e. the position of the University of Turin Green Office within the City of Turin sustainability ecosystem, are discussed showing how social network analysis centrality degrees can be used to quantitatively assess the role of an organization within a stakeholders’ ecosystem. Social implications Centrality analysis allows identifying emergent topics/stakeholders within a network of words/actors that, at a first sight, should not be considered by decision-makers and managers. Originality/value A new methodology for stakeholder identification and prioritization is proposed exploiting online data visualization tools, participatory mapping and social network analysis.

Corporate Sustainability Performance Evaluation and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan

“…In descriptive form, stakeholder theory describes whether the organizations have stakeholders and on the empirical side it provides the prediction of the organizations' orientation toward their stakeholders (Donaldson & Preston, 1995). In descriptive form, the stakeholder theory is a tool that provides a basis for mapping the stakeholders (Cottafava & Corazza, 2021).…”

Are red managers greener? The relationship of communist CEOs and corporate environmental responsibility in China

“…Even if this CEO is a CPC member, he/she still will be unlikely to resist the temptation of interests, so he/she will reduce environmental investment. On the contrary, if a family business's CEO and chairman are separated, then when the CEO formulates related policies, he/she should consider the long-term benefits for the enterprise and its stakeholders (Cottafava and Corazza, 2021), and moreover, because of the social benefits emphasized by CEOs' ideological imprints, CEOs imprinted with communist ideology will take more environmental responsibility.…”

Guest editorial

“…The empirical implications for the organisation environment are examined. Cottafava and Corazza (2021) propose a tool to identify and assess active stakeholders of an organisation, Liu et al (2021) elaborate on the effects of institutional support on green innovation performance, and (Xu et al , 2021) the price formation supporting the viability of all stakeholders in the supply chain. Zhang et al (2021) provide relations between pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain.…”

“…2.8 Co-design of a stakeholders' ecosystem: an assessment methodology by linking social network analysis, stakeholder theory and participatory mapping. Based on the stakeholder theory (Cottafava and Corazza, 2021) propose a user-friendly visualisation tool and a unique approach to identify and engage stakeholders, to co-design the sustainability ecosystem at the local scale, to explore it and to assess the impact of a large organisation within the identified ecosystem.…”

“…They (Cottafava and Corazza, 2021) post that: betweenness centrality results to be the best indicator to assess the importance of a stakeholder concerning the whole network, while eigenvector centrality highlights the quality of the already engaged stakeholders of an organisation, as it mainly depends on the number of links of the first order neighbours. On the contrary, the closeness centrality, when applied to a small network, seems to be not appropriate to assess the centrality of a stakeholder.…”