2017
DOI: 10.1002/cptx.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co‐Culture of Neurons and Microglia

Abstract: Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, have been implicated in numerous neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases. Activation of microglia by a variety of stimuli has been shown to induce the release of numerous factors that contribute to neuro-inflammation and oxidative stress, two crucial processes linked to disorders of the central nervous system. The in vitro techniques described here will provide a set of protocols for the isolation and plating of primary cerebellar granule neurons, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(107 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these models have provided significant insights into neuroinflammatory processes [15], these models contain inherent limitations, most notably the inability to observe the effects of membrane-bound or cell proximity-dependent mechanisms and the fact that the concentration of secreted cytokines transferred between cultures may not be physiologically relevant. An alternative model involves seeding microglia over a previously established primary neuron culture to observe the effect of this cell-cell interaction over a short period of time (24-72 h) [16][17][18]. In addition to the limited time-scale of this model, the culture media used to support the microglia prior to their addition to the neuronal culture typically contains a high concentration of serum, likely causing the microglia to be in an already activated state before their addition to the neuronal cell cultures [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these models have provided significant insights into neuroinflammatory processes [15], these models contain inherent limitations, most notably the inability to observe the effects of membrane-bound or cell proximity-dependent mechanisms and the fact that the concentration of secreted cytokines transferred between cultures may not be physiologically relevant. An alternative model involves seeding microglia over a previously established primary neuron culture to observe the effect of this cell-cell interaction over a short period of time (24-72 h) [16][17][18]. In addition to the limited time-scale of this model, the culture media used to support the microglia prior to their addition to the neuronal culture typically contains a high concentration of serum, likely causing the microglia to be in an already activated state before their addition to the neuronal cell cultures [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, (i) a rather high number of animals must be sacrificed for each experiment. Keeping in mind the necessity for enforced application of high animal welfare standards, an ethical evaluation and consideration of the scientific significance, e.g., a scientific validation for harm-benefit analysis for each and every experiment has to be considered [100,101]; (ii) in order to warrant a sufficient cell number and appropriate purity of neonatal microglia for in vitro approaches, different methods have been described and comprehensively reviewed [99,102,103]. The herein used method is based on the most frequently used differential adherence method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reductionist in vitro system allows for preliminary questions to be asked about microglial neurogenic potential in the cortex and can be used for future studies with other microglial cell lines and primary microglial cells. These studies do not negate the role of microglia in other areas of the brain such as the cerebellum studied using similar in vitro methods [ 79 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%