Co-creating dementia care: manoeuvring fractured reflexivity in service design

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to theorise and empirically investigate how vulnerable users suffering from cognitive impairments can be involved in service design.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected through an ongoing field study following the processes of designing new forms of dementia care. The data consist of document studies, observations and interviews with actors involved in the service design process.FindingsThe findings demonstrate how the involvement of vulnerable users with cognitive impairment in service design requires the ability to manoeuvre users' “fractured reflexivity”. The design process was found to be constrained and enabled by three interrelated features: cognitive aspects, social aspects and representativeness.Practical implicationsThis paper provides insight into concrete ways of involving vulnerable user groups in service design. The introduced concept – fractured reflexivity – may create awareness of how the involvement of users with cognitive impairment can be difficult but is also valuable, providing a means to rethink what may enable involvement and how to manage the constraints.Originality/valueAlthough design processes rely on reflexivity, there is limited research addressing how reflexivity capacity differs among actors. The authors contribute by exploring how fractured reflexivity may aid the analysis and understandings of intertwined issues related to the involvement of users with cognitive impairment. Therefore, this study initiates research on how service design entails enactments of different modes of reflexivity. The paper concludes with directions for future research avenues on service design and reflexivity modes.

Men’s transformative health service use: rethinking customer experience of vulnerability

“…Gender norms are a psychosocial source of customer vulnerability (Baker et al , 2005; Baker and Mason, 2012) and consist of perceptions including stigma, identity and status-loss. As Table 1 outlines, previous empirical TSR research examining customer/consumer vulnerability has identified the importance of these psychosocial sources of customer vulnerability as both ex ante (McGraw et al , 2020; Tanner et al , 2020) and ex post (Bast et al , 2021; Mele et al , 2022; Raciti et al , 2022).…”

“…Furthermore, customer/consumer vulnerability literature is dominated by cross-sectional research with limited examination over time, particularly timeframes spanning several years. The longitudinal research already undertaken specific to transformative services is mostly between six and 13 months (Amine and Gatfaoui, 2019; Batat, 2015; Mende and Van Doorn, 2015), with the exception of some 2–2.5 year studies (Bast et al , 2021; Boenigk et al , 2021). Longitudinal research with relatively short timeframes does not capture progressive phenomena particular to complex health services.…”

Designing energy solutions: a comparison of two participatory design approaches for service innovation

“…Ensuring users, especially vulnerable users, and those with constrained capacity, can claim their right to participation and feel empowered to directly voice their needs requires an Designing energy solutions exploration of diverse methods for involvement (Bast et al, 2021). A range of participatory design methods may be used in the creation of new and innovative services including design thinking (Brown, 2008;Brown and Wyatt, 2010) and co-design (Trischler et al, 2019;Schmidtke et al, 2021).…”

“…Ensuring users, especially vulnerable users, and those with constrained capacity, can claim their right to participation and feel empowered to directly voice their needs requires an exploration of diverse methods for involvement (Bast et al. , 2021).…”

Mediating roles of frontline employees in transformative service processes

“…These constraints have been linked to a lack of skills and competencies, language barriers, physical health conditions, cognitive impairments and other associated factors (Davey and Grönroos, 2019; Dietrich et al , 2017; Mulvale et al , 2019). Hence, including the voices of consumers in the design and transformation of services, specifically by targeting vulnerable groups, depends on the ability to involve representations and representatives that effectively convey the needs and perspectives of service users (Bast et al , 2021; Eriksson, 2019; Røhnebæk and Bjerck, 2021). The use of representatives can be seen as a way of working around, or coping with, the diverse constraints that limit the direct involvement of vulnerable groups.…”