Micro Process Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9783527631445.ch44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO Clean‐Up: Preferential Oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microreactors can help to meet those requirements [4,5]. More specifically, due to the very fast chemical kinetics and exothermicity of CO-PrOx, using microreactors allows avoiding mass and heat transport limitations which results in improved reactor performance and reaction selectivity [6][7][8]. As reviewed by Ouyang and Besser [8], there are several examples of integrated fuel processors in the power range between 2.4 W e and 2 kW e including CO-PrOx units based on microreaction technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microreactors can help to meet those requirements [4,5]. More specifically, due to the very fast chemical kinetics and exothermicity of CO-PrOx, using microreactors allows avoiding mass and heat transport limitations which results in improved reactor performance and reaction selectivity [6][7][8]. As reviewed by Ouyang and Besser [8], there are several examples of integrated fuel processors in the power range between 2.4 W e and 2 kW e including CO-PrOx units based on microreaction technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, due to the very fast chemical kinetics and exothermicity of CO-PrOx, using microreactors allows avoiding mass and heat transport limitations which results in improved reactor performance and reaction selectivity [6][7][8]. As reviewed by Ouyang and Besser [8], there are several examples of integrated fuel processors in the power range between 2.4 W e and 2 kW e including CO-PrOx units based on microreaction technology. More recently, Kolb et al [9] and O'Connell et al [10] have reported on microstructured reactors in the 2.5-5 kW electrical output developed for CO-PrOx reaction although the catalyst used (Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells) was not specified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microreactors have the advantages of fast response time, easy integration, and small footprint, which are ideal for portable power systems. In addition, enhanced mass and heat transport properties are also widely recognized as advantages of microreactors [2][3][4][5][6]. In addition to this, recent studies of simulated CO-PROX reactions have shown that the reverse water-gas-shift side reaction is favoured in the case of packed bed reactors with respect to thin catalytic films deposited on microchannel walls [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, recent studies of simulated CO-PROX reactions have shown that the reverse water-gas-shift side reaction is favoured in the case of packed bed reactors with respect to thin catalytic films deposited on microchannel walls [4]. Therefore, CO-PROX units based on microchannel reactors have been reported as part of integrated fuel processors in a wide power range [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%