2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.28.225706
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-circulation of multiple influenza A variants in swine harboring genes from seasonal human and swine influenza viruses

Abstract: Since the influenza pandemic in 2009, there has been an increased focus on swine influenza A virus (swIAV) surveillance. This paper describes the results of the surveillance of swIAV in Danish swine from 2011 to 2018.In total, 3800 submissions were received with a steady increase in swIAV positive submissions, reaching 56% in 2018. Ten different swIAV subtypes were detected. Full genome sequences were obtained from 129 swIAV positive samples. Altogether, 17 different circulating genotypes were identified inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the 2WF10:6pH1N1 virus was also able to transmit by airborne route, although with delayed replication kinetics, whereas no evidence of airborne transmission with 1WF10:7pH1N1 was observed, suggesting that compatibility and balance between the HA and NA is also important (Figure 2B). It is tempting to speculate that the pH1N1 backbone is more flexible to accept reassortment with diverse surface genes and does provide a replicative advantage in mammals, as has been observed in multiple examples of reassortant H1N1 and H3N2 viruses in swine [127][128][129][130]. Sequencing information showed a S261N mutation in PB1 and V104A in HA in the viruses isolated from respiratory contact animals (Table 1); however, the role of those positions in airborne transmission remains unknown [88].…”
Section: Experimental Infections/transmission Of H9n2 Iav In Mammalian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the 2WF10:6pH1N1 virus was also able to transmit by airborne route, although with delayed replication kinetics, whereas no evidence of airborne transmission with 1WF10:7pH1N1 was observed, suggesting that compatibility and balance between the HA and NA is also important (Figure 2B). It is tempting to speculate that the pH1N1 backbone is more flexible to accept reassortment with diverse surface genes and does provide a replicative advantage in mammals, as has been observed in multiple examples of reassortant H1N1 and H3N2 viruses in swine [127][128][129][130]. Sequencing information showed a S261N mutation in PB1 and V104A in HA in the viruses isolated from respiratory contact animals (Table 1); however, the role of those positions in airborne transmission remains unknown [88].…”
Section: Experimental Infections/transmission Of H9n2 Iav In Mammalian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%