2018
DOI: 10.18032/kaaba.2018.31.3.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-CEO and Investment Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, previous studies related to co-CEOs show that the co-CEO structure has the advantage of being able to create synergy effects in corporate management through mutual cooperation and enhancing the quality of management through mutual monitoring (Kandel and Lazear, 1992;Park and Hyun, 2018). On the other hand, there are disadvantages that the co-CEO structure might lead to inefficiency by focusing more on dispute resolution than cooperation because of intensifying competition (Hackman, 2002;Krause et al, 2015).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, previous studies related to co-CEOs show that the co-CEO structure has the advantage of being able to create synergy effects in corporate management through mutual cooperation and enhancing the quality of management through mutual monitoring (Kandel and Lazear, 1992;Park and Hyun, 2018). On the other hand, there are disadvantages that the co-CEO structure might lead to inefficiency by focusing more on dispute resolution than cooperation because of intensifying competition (Hackman, 2002;Krause et al, 2015).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the power gap between co-CEOs is large, then the benefit of shared leadership is weakened (Pearce and Conger, 2002; Sally, 2002), and if the co-CEO power is not horizontal, then the co-CEO structure may not work effectively (Haleblian and Finkelstein, 1993). When there are co-CEO power gaps, it is difficult for CEOs with strong authority to share leadership (Hackman, 2002; Krause et al , 2015; Park and Hyun, 2018). Krause et al (2015) demonstrate that if the power gap between co-CEOs is large, then the two CEOs do not have an additional positive effect on the firm’s value compared to a single-CEO structure.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%