Co-Authorship Networks in Business Ethics: A Longitudinal Study

Köseoğlu, Mehmet Ali; Yıldız, Mehmet; Putra, Eka Dıraksa; Cıftcı, Taha

doi:10.5530/jscires.7.3.32

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, collaboration between three or more authors is a foreseeable trend in the future hospitality and tourism research structure. The findings also correspond to those of other co-authorship studies in business (Donthu et al, 2020), business ethics (Köseoglu et al, 2018b), accounting (Kılıç et al, 2019), social science (Henriksen, 2016) and economics (Kuld and O'Hagan, 2018). The plausible reasons of the increasing trend of multi-authored articles included declining communication and travel costs, increasing number of academic conferences, mobility of researchers, monetary incentive per published articles and pressure for international research collaboration (Fire and Guestrin, 2019;Kuld and O'Hagan, 2018).…”

Section: Descriptive Analysis For Authorship Structure and Research Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 78%

Creation and dissemination of hospitality and tourism research outputs in the new millennium

Wong

Köseoğlu

Kim

2021

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to examine the current state of the research activities of scholars in the hospitality and tourism field by analyzing the first 20 years of the new millennium. Design/methodology/approach Longitudinal analyses using 14,229 journal articles as data source were realized by adopting BibExcel, Gephi and VOSviewer network analysis software packages. Findings This study provides a comprehensive overview of the hospitality and tourism research based on authorship and social network analysis, with patterns of prolific authors compared over four distinct periods. Research limitations/implications The hospitality and tourism academic society is clearly illustrated by tracing academic publication activities across 20 years in the new millennium. In addition, this study provides a guide for scholars to search for multidisciplinary collaboration opportunities. Government agencies and non-governmental organisations can also benefit from this study by identifying appropriate review panel members when making decisions about hospitality- and tourism-related proposals. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to use bibliometric analysis in assessing research published in leading hospitality and tourism journals across the four breakout periods in the new millennium.

show abstract

Section: Descriptive Analysis For Authorship Structure and Research Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 78%

Creation and dissemination of hospitality and tourism research outputs in the new millennium

Wong

Köseoğlu

Kim

2021

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More the value of CC of the particular year indicates the dominance of multi-authorship of that year. The collaboration and multi-authorship pattern has been supported by CAI and CC in most of the scientometric studies like Thanuskodi (2020), Koseoglu et al (2019), Singh (2017), Garg and Tripathi (2017), Filardo et al (2016), etc.…”

Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 88%

Research output of Indian universities in sciences (2015–2019): a scientometric analysis

Mahala¹,

Singh

2021

LHT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe present study aims to trace out the science research output of top Indian universities from 2015 to 2019, as reflected in the Web of Science (WOS) database.Design/methodology/approachThe present study has selected the Science Citation Index (SCI) of WOS core collection for selecting top Indian universities in terms of total publications in the last five years (2015–2019). The University of Delhi (DU), Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Anna University (AU), Jadavpur University (JU) and Punjab University (PU) have been selected. The study identified the most prolific authors, collaborating countries, collaborating institutions and the impact of their output in terms of citations per paper (CPP) and relative citation impact (RCI). For visualizing purposes, VOSviewer was used. The study also identified frequently used keywords and channels used for communicating research results.FindingsThe authors retrieved 26,173 documents consisting of journal articles, review papers and proceeding papers. The consistent growth of science research output has been observed. The University of Delhi (DU) has the maximum science publications. The study reflects that multi-authored papers have more research impact in terms of citation received. The USA, South Korea and Germany are the most collaborating countries. The top Indian Universities have a major collaboration with Anna University, Indian Institute of Technology, Center for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) of India.Originality/valueThe present study reveals how the science research output of top Indian universities has grown in the last few years. The findings of the study can be used for identifying specific science research areas where special attention can be given.

show abstract

“…In an article, Koseoglu et al Evaluated co-authorship networks in scientific publications published in four prestigious international journals in the field of business ethics. Their research findings show an increase in the rate of cooperation during the years 1960 to 2015 [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Survey of Medical Ethics Research with the Science Drawing Method

Yaminfirooz

Tahmasbei

Amiri³

2020

IJMMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advancement of human knowledge in the field of medical science has brought activists to the field with new ethical issues. addressing medical ethical issues is one of the essential requirements in the health system. at present, the evaluation of science production can provide a clear picture of the growth, progress and important issues of a scientific field. in this study, we aimed to identify important areas of research in the field of medical ethics through a scientometric study. This is a scientometrics research using one of the most important techniques of this method, namely, the drawing of science. the statistical population of the study consisted of 3333 scientific papers indexed in the WOS database by the end of 2019. a researcher-made checklist was used for data collection and Ravar-matrix and ucinet6 software were used for data analysis. The results showed that the amount of scientific output in the field of medical ethics is 3333, starting with 1946 with two documents and reaching 2019 with 104 documents. the average annual growth rate is 21.03%. the world of medical ethics consists of 9 clusters worldwide and the concepts of bioethics, ethical counseling, education, medical education and autonomy have been the most commonly used keywords in medical ethics research, respectively. Iranian products in this field also consist of 6 clusters which are the key concepts in medical ethics, bioethics, ethics committee, strategic planning and medical education.

show abstract

Co-Authorship Networks in Business Ethics: A Longitudinal Study

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Creation and dissemination of hospitality and tourism research outputs in the new millennium

Creation and dissemination of hospitality and tourism research outputs in the new millennium

Research output of Indian universities in sciences (2015–2019): a scientometric analysis

Survey of Medical Ethics Research with the Science Drawing Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About