2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO 2 adsorption over modified AC samples: A new methodology for determining selectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous results presented for adsorption of CO 2 / CH 4 gas mixtures on modified activated carbons suggest enhanced CH 4 uptakes in the presence of CO 2 , possibly as the result of a modified adsorption mechanism (Acar et al 2018), the results shown here indicate no such enhancement. This difference may well be due to the difference in adsorption conditions (298 K vs. 333 K used here) and the resulting difference in scale of adsorption for the two systems, where the mass of CO 2 sorbed for the modified activated carbons (up to 110 mg/g at 1 bar pure CO 2 ) may alter the uptake of the second gas, while, here, the adsorption capacity does not extend beyond the monolayer.…”
Section: Gas Sweetening: Adsorptive Selectivity Of Co 2 Over Chcontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While previous results presented for adsorption of CO 2 / CH 4 gas mixtures on modified activated carbons suggest enhanced CH 4 uptakes in the presence of CO 2 , possibly as the result of a modified adsorption mechanism (Acar et al 2018), the results shown here indicate no such enhancement. This difference may well be due to the difference in adsorption conditions (298 K vs. 333 K used here) and the resulting difference in scale of adsorption for the two systems, where the mass of CO 2 sorbed for the modified activated carbons (up to 110 mg/g at 1 bar pure CO 2 ) may alter the uptake of the second gas, while, here, the adsorption capacity does not extend beyond the monolayer.…”
Section: Gas Sweetening: Adsorptive Selectivity Of Co 2 Over Chcontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…This difference may well be due to the difference in adsorption conditions (298 K vs. 333 K used here) and the resulting difference in scale of adsorption for the two systems, where the mass of CO 2 sorbed for the modified activated carbons (up to 110 mg/g at 1 bar pure CO 2 ) may alter the uptake of the second gas, while, here, the adsorption capacity does not extend beyond the monolayer. Despite the large CO 2 uptakes demonstrated for these modified carbons (Acar et al 2018), they exhibited modest CO 2 /CH 4 selectivities, possibly as a result of this binary component enhancement.…”
Section: Gas Sweetening: Adsorptive Selectivity Of Co 2 Over Chmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, solid adsorption, liquid absorption and membrane separation can be mentioned as the main methods for CO 2 capture [2,6]. Among these methods, CO 2 adsorption is a prominent method due to its advantages such as low energy requirement, low cost, ease of application, and regeneration of the adsorbent [7][8][9][10]. In order for CO 2 adsorption to be efficient, it is important to develop an adsorbent with a high adsorption capacity, selectivity, kinetics and stability [7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, CO 2 adsorption is a prominent method due to its advantages such as low energy requirement, low cost, ease of application, and regeneration of the adsorbent [7][8][9][10]. In order for CO 2 adsorption to be efficient, it is important to develop an adsorbent with a high adsorption capacity, selectivity, kinetics and stability [7,11]. Commonly used solid adsorbents for CO 2 capture are zeolites [12][13], silicas [14], clay minerals [15], metal-organic frameworks [16][17][18][19], porous polymer materials [20][21][22] and carbon materials [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain CO2 adsorbents with high selectivity, high capacity, high hydrothermality, good mechanical properties, chemical stability, low synthesis cost and also fast adsorption/desorption kinetics has long been an attractive field of investigation (Pevida et al, 2008;Díez et al, 2015;Sarkera et al, 2017;Szczęśniak et al, 2017;Acar et al, 2018). The adsorption process using certain adsorbents is one of the most effective methods for separating or capturing CO2, due to its easy operation and low energy requirements (Lee & Park, 2015;Pham et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%