The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2920889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNV_IFTV: An Isolation Forest and Total Variation-Based Detection of CNVs from Short-Read Sequencing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of the simulation experiments is described as follows: we adopt our previously developed simulation tool IntSIM (Yuan et al, 2017) to produce various datasets with varying tumor purity from 0.2 to 0.4 and varying sequencing coverage depth from 4× to 6× (Yuan et al, 2019b). In each simulation configuration, 50 replicated samples are generated for a sufficient test of our proposed method and the peer methods.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design of the simulation experiments is described as follows: we adopt our previously developed simulation tool IntSIM (Yuan et al, 2017) to produce various datasets with varying tumor purity from 0.2 to 0.4 and varying sequencing coverage depth from 4× to 6× (Yuan et al, 2019b). In each simulation configuration, 50 replicated samples are generated for a sufficient test of our proposed method and the peer methods.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when facing with relatively low-coverage-depth data, the false-positive rate of CNVnator is not easy to control due to the influence from artifacts such as GC-content bias and uneven distribution of reads, although the CNVnator method has dealt with the GC bias in a reasonable way. Other popular RD-based methods include ReadDepth (Miller et al, 2011), XCAVATOR (Magi et al, 2017), Wavedec (Cai et al, 2018), seqCNV (Chen et al, 2017), iCopyDAV (Dharanipragada et al, 2018), GROM-RD (Smith et al, 2015), CONDEL (Yuan et al, 2018a), CLImAT (Yu et al, 2014), CNV_IFTV (Yuan et al, 2019b), m-HMM (Wang et al, 2014), DCC (Yuan et al, 2018c), CNV-seq (Xie and Tammi, 2009), and FREEC (Boeva et al, 2012). The characteristics of the existing methods are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any version of a reference genome, there are a large number of N values in genome positions (Yuan et al, 2019). The value of N means that the base has not been determined yet in the construction of the reference genome.…”
Section: Processing Of N Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbol λ represents the penalty parameter that controls the trade-off between the first term (which can be called fitting error) and the second term (which can be called the total variation penalty). It is difficult to determine the value of λ (Condat, 2013;Duan et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2019). When it tends to zero, the effect of the penalty term is minimal, and a is equal to b.…”
Section: Denoising Using Tv (Total Variation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AITAC is written and implemented in Python. To make a complete analysis pipeline from sequencing data to a report on tumor purity and absolute copy numbers, we incorporate our previously developed CNV detection method, CNV_IFTV (Yuan et al, 2019b), into the AITAC algorithm. The source code of AITAC is available at https://github.com/BDanalysis/aitac and can be downloaded freely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%