2009
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90835.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNTF 1357 G → A polymorphism and the muscle strength response to resistance training

Abstract: The present study examined associations between the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) 1357 G --> A polymorphism and the muscle strength response to a unilateral, upper arm resistance-training (RT) program among healthy, young adults. Subjects were 754 Caucasian men (40%) and women (60%) who were genotyped and performed a training program of the nondominant (trained) arm with the dominant (untrained) arm as a comparison. Peak elbow flexor strength was measured with one repetition maximum, isometric strength wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, subjects with the ANKRD6 631 LL genotype spent approximately 60% more hours per week in moderate-intensity PA than those who were carriers of the P allele, whereas it appears that they spent approximately 50% less hours per week in vigorous-intensity PA, although these latter findings did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest that ANKRD6 genetic predispositions may be important to consider along with a growing number of genetic variants that have been reported to be associated with muscle performance (6,13,21,32) and habitual PA (7,8,14) when an individualized approach to PA prescription for health benefit based on genotype becomes more of a reality (22). For example, when recommending PA to adults for its overall health benefits, the ANKRD6 631 P>L and PA intensity-dependent genotype differences we found could be considered when encouraging people to become more physically active due to what appears to be genetic dispositions to prefer moderate over vigorous-intensity PA among those with the LL genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, subjects with the ANKRD6 631 LL genotype spent approximately 60% more hours per week in moderate-intensity PA than those who were carriers of the P allele, whereas it appears that they spent approximately 50% less hours per week in vigorous-intensity PA, although these latter findings did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest that ANKRD6 genetic predispositions may be important to consider along with a growing number of genetic variants that have been reported to be associated with muscle performance (6,13,21,32) and habitual PA (7,8,14) when an individualized approach to PA prescription for health benefit based on genotype becomes more of a reality (22). For example, when recommending PA to adults for its overall health benefits, the ANKRD6 631 P>L and PA intensity-dependent genotype differences we found could be considered when encouraging people to become more physically active due to what appears to be genetic dispositions to prefer moderate over vigorous-intensity PA among those with the LL genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it has been suggested that hand grip strength maybe suitable for identifying genetic variants affecting mid-and late-life physical functioning. Indeed, a number of genetic variants in relation to this phenotype have been identified (Arking et al 2006;Roth et al 2001;Dato et al 2010;Ronkainen et al 2008;Walsh et al 2009Walsh et al , 2008De Mars et al 2007). In the present study we show that the variability of UCP3 rs1800849, located in the promoter region of the gene, affects hand grip strength in an elderly population from southern Italy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the biceps brachii was determined bilaterally using MRI with 1.5T systems and described in detail elsewhere (Kostek et al 2007; Walsh et al 2009). MRI was done pre-RT and within 48–96 hr of the final RT session.…”
Section: 1 Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%