2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.160503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNOT and Bell-state analysis in the weak-coupling cavity QED regime

Abstract: We propose an interface between the spin of a photon and the spin of an electron confined in a quantum dot embedded in a microcavity operating in the weak-coupling regime. This interface, based on spin selective photon reflection from the cavity, can be used to construct a CNOT gate, a multiphoton entangler and a photonic Bell-state analyzer. Finally, we analyze experimental feasibility, concluding that the schemes can be implemented with current technology. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.160503 PACS numbers: 0… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
316
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
316
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum gates are the key components for quantum information processing in an analog to the classical gates for classical information processing. To design deterministic quantum gates, three types of interactions can be exploited, i.e., photon-photon interactions [10][11][12], spin-spin interactions [13][14][15][16][17][18], and photon-spin interactions [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Although photons do not interact directly with each other intrinsically, photon-photon indirect interactions mediated by cavity QED have been demonstrated but are by definition nonlinear phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum gates are the key components for quantum information processing in an analog to the classical gates for classical information processing. To design deterministic quantum gates, three types of interactions can be exploited, i.e., photon-photon interactions [10][11][12], spin-spin interactions [13][14][15][16][17][18], and photon-spin interactions [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Although photons do not interact directly with each other intrinsically, photon-photon indirect interactions mediated by cavity QED have been demonstrated but are by definition nonlinear phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many theoretical works have suggested using nanophotonic cavities or waveguides to attain a high-bandwidth interface between spins and photons in a solid-state device [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . These proposals exploit strong light-matter interactions to create a quantum switch that applies a spindependent quantum phase or amplitude modulation to a photon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the input photon is in the state |R ↓ or |L ↑ (S z = −1), it will be transmitted through the cavity and acquires an extra π phase, leaving the electron spin state unaffected. The whole process can be summarized into the following transformations [24]:…”
Section: Faithful Entanglement Distribution and Extension For Hermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the circularly polarized photon directed into the spin-cavity system can either be coupled with the electron spin and feels a hot cavity when the dipole selection rule is fulfilled, or be decoupled and feels a cold cavity in the other case. The significant difference in the reflection and the transmission coefficients manifested between these two cases is spin dependent, and it can be exploited to perform the quantum information processing [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Faithful Entanglement Distribution and Extension For Hermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation