Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006582101580165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNN Patch--Based Voting for Fingerprint Liveness Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this patch-wise trend, Toosi et al tested in [27] the accuracy of AlexNet with data augmentation. For classification, the scores are calibrated using log-likelihood ratios.…”
Section: B Deep Learning For Conventional Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following this patch-wise trend, Toosi et al tested in [27] the accuracy of AlexNet with data augmentation. For classification, the scores are calibrated using log-likelihood ratios.…”
Section: B Deep Learning For Conventional Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the aforementioned advances have allowed the deployment of DL architectures in many different fields, including biometric recognition [22], [23]. More specifically, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and deep belief networks (DBNs) have been used for fingerprint PAD purposes, based either on the complete fingerprint samples [24]- [26] or on a patch-wise manner [27]- [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publicly available LivDet datasets [18][19][20][21][22][23] established a well known and commonly used foundation for software-based fingerprint PAD development. While early fingerprint PAD algorithms mostly utilised handcrafted feature extractions and classifiers [24][25][26][27][28][29], a shift towards deep learning approaches is noticeable in more recent publications [30][31][32][33]. However, when focussing on unknown attacks and cross-sensor and cross-database scenarios, it is clear that handcrafted methods are able to outperform deep learning approaches, as was shown by the winner of the LivDet 2019 competition [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the many advantages, iris biometric systems are highly susceptible to presentation attacks, usually referred to as spoofing techniques, that attempt to conceal or impersonate other identities [Kohli et al, 2016, Toosi et al, 2017, Pala and Bhanu, 2017, Czajka and Bowyer, 2018,Sajjad et al, 2019,Tolosana et al, 2020. Examples of typical iris spoofing attacks include printed iris images, video playbacks, artificial eyes, and textured contact lenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%