2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNN disruption predictor at JET: Early versus late data fusion approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disruption prediction models, including this work, aim to be used for disruption avoidance [61][62][63] or mitigation [64]. This work focused on developing a reliable event alarm to predict the occurrence of disruptions with the Bayesian framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruption prediction models, including this work, aim to be used for disruption avoidance [61][62][63] or mitigation [64]. This work focused on developing a reliable event alarm to predict the occurrence of disruptions with the Bayesian framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven disruption prediction, benefiting from decades of data accumulation during the operation of tokamaks, is a highly feasible approach for disruption prediction. Numerous data-driven disruption predictors have been developed on JET [7][8][9][10][11][12], ASDEX-U [13], DIII-D [14,15], C-Mod [14,16], JT-60U [17], HL-2A [18,19], EAST [20][21][22], and J-TEXT [23][24][25] with high accuracy on their own tokamaks. However, the high-performance operation of future tokamaks imposes a significant cost for unmitigated disruption, making it impractical to achieve large data for training such models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%