1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00196-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNF producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle in Northern Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
12
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
12
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the NTEC‐positive animals were infected with CNF2‐producing E. coli . This is in agreement with the results of other authors (Blanco et al., 1992b, 1993, 1998; Burns et al., 1996; Orden et al., 1999) who found that CNF2‐positive NTEC strains were frequently isolated from healthy calves. These results suggest that NTEC producing CNF2 may be a part of the normal intestinal flora of cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All of the NTEC‐positive animals were infected with CNF2‐producing E. coli . This is in agreement with the results of other authors (Blanco et al., 1992b, 1993, 1998; Burns et al., 1996; Orden et al., 1999) who found that CNF2‐positive NTEC strains were frequently isolated from healthy calves. These results suggest that NTEC producing CNF2 may be a part of the normal intestinal flora of cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, the proportions of NTEC strains reported in more recent studies (Burns et al, 1996;Pohl et al, 1997;reviewed in De Rycke et al, 1999) are much higher. These differences can be explained by (a) the type of the animal populations sampled as for instance the risk of NTEC infection increases after the ®rst month of life (Orden et al, 1999); or (b) the changes throughout the years in animal husbandry as intensive rearing, which can favour the dissemination of bacterial pathogens, has increased since the early 1960s; or (c) the decrease of incidence of other pathogens because of husbandry and vaccinal prophylaxis as for enterotoxigenic E. coli; or (d) the selection of resistant clones and/or plasmids by extensive antibiotic use; or (e) an increased awareness and the apparition of better laboratory techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The O serogroups recognised vary, but the most frequently observed were O78 and O15; which are indeed frequently associated with bovine NTEC2 strains (Burns et al, 1996;Mainil et al, 1999). On the other hand, serogroups observed among NTEC1 are not common Mainil et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several groups have reported an epidemiological link between the presence of cnf1+ genotype, or the production of CNF1, and E. coli strains that caused extraintestinal disease. CNF2, is a commonly occurring virulence factor among healthy cattle (Burns, Ball, & Finlay, 1996;Pohl et al, 1993). Indeed, we reported a high prevalence of the CNF1 in faeces of healthy cattle (Hassan & Awad-Masalmeh -unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%