1973
DOI: 10.1080/00268977300101071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNDO/SP calculation ofg-tensors of free radicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon irradiation with UV light, several EPR signals appeared with a central g value of 2.0045, which was consistent with the value of the free electron of 2.0023. 34–36 Time dependent EPR spectra showed the details of signal evolution and hyperfine splitting (Fig. 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Upon irradiation with UV light, several EPR signals appeared with a central g value of 2.0045, which was consistent with the value of the free electron of 2.0023. 34–36 Time dependent EPR spectra showed the details of signal evolution and hyperfine splitting (Fig. 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…where "occ" and "unocc" refer to the Ag contributions from occupied and unoccupied MOs, respectively. This parametrization, first introduced by Chuvylkin et al 56 for the calculation of Agtj of various hydrocarbon radicals on the basis of the CNDO method (these authors used a more restrictive parametrization with A0" = Aunocc = 4), gives considerably improved results. We found A0** = 3, Aunocc = 1 to give the best fit to the experimental values of Agxx and Agyy (results given in Table I).…”
Section: B0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not surprising that the calculation of EPR g tensors of molecules and metal complexes from first principles and using semiempirical methods has a long history. Earlier attempts to get a theoretical handle on the g tensor were based on semiempirical methods; for instance, Hückel theory and variants thereof, or the semiempirical Hartree–Fock (HF) approximations INDO and CNDO. The connection between the spin-Hamiltonian and first-principles electronic structure theory can be made with the help of perturbation theory and the use of partitioning techniques. , In earlier g tensor calculations, a major focus was on assessing the importance of approximations made in second order perturbation calculations, the problem of gauge invariance, the importance of two-electron spin–orbit and spin-other-orbit terms, or contributions from higher order terms . Among the earliest g tensor calculations using HF theory and including all the spin–orbit terms as a perturbation were those by Moores and McWeeny .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%