2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMV Late Phase-Induced mTOR Activation Is Essential for Efficient Virus Replication in Polarized Human Macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(71 reference statements)
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous studies, we found that M2 M are more susceptible to HCMV infection than M1 M (17,18). Additionally, we observed a more efficient expression of all three classes of viral proteins as well as a 10-times-higher release of viral progenies in M2 compared to M1 M. The ultrastructural analysis of the course of infection revealed that the viral morphogenetic events occurring in primary M were comparable to those previously observed in fibroblasts (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with previous studies, we found that M2 M are more susceptible to HCMV infection than M1 M (17,18). Additionally, we observed a more efficient expression of all three classes of viral proteins as well as a 10-times-higher release of viral progenies in M2 compared to M1 M. The ultrastructural analysis of the course of infection revealed that the viral morphogenetic events occurring in primary M were comparable to those previously observed in fibroblasts (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The M2 designation refers to alternatively activated M, namely, a very heterogeneous group of cells contributing to resolution of inflammation, tissue repair, extracellular matrix remodeling, and pathogen scavenging. Recent evidence indicates different susceptibilities of M1 and M2 M to HCMV infection (17,18). Nevertheless, the course of HCMV infection in these two types of M as well as the M-specific contribution to the adaptive immune response against HCMV still remains elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, M2 alternatively activated macrophages productively infected with HCMV are ineffective in stimulation of natural killer (NK) cells, while M1 macrophages are able to efficiently promote NK cell-mediated IFN-␥ secretion (49). Furthermore, this and other studies reported more efficient HCMV replication in M2 alternatively activated macrophages than in M1 classically activated macrophages (49)(50)(51). Taken together with the findings we present here, the increased permissiveness of M2 macrophages to HCMV productive infection raises the intriguing possibility that viral IL-10-mediated polarization of monocytes to an M2c phenotype not only results in deactivation of the CD4 ϩ T cell function but also may enhance the efficiency of subsequent HCMV infection when viral IL-10-polarized monocytes differentiate into M2c macrophages at sites of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The importance of mTORC1 activation in the life cycle of HCMV has been demonstrated by in vitro studies (14,20,21,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The therapeutic immune suppression in transplant recipients with mTORC1 inhibitors has significantly reduced the incidence of HCMV reactivation (44,45), implying an antiviral role of targeting mTORC1 in clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%