2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMD: a Cotton Microsatellite Database resource for Gossypium genomics

Abstract: Background: The Cotton Microsatellite Database (CMD) http://www.cottonssr.org is a curated and integrated web-based relational database providing centralized access to publicly available cotton microsatellites, an invaluable resource for basic and applied research in cotton breeding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Wrst step was to identify cotton simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers identiWed as polymorphic in previous studies identiWed in the Cotton Marker Database (Blenda et al 2006). From the pool of polymorphic markers identiWed, the second step was to select markers to ensure complete coverage of each cotton linkage group or chromosome.…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wrst step was to identify cotton simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers identiWed as polymorphic in previous studies identiWed in the Cotton Marker Database (Blenda et al 2006). From the pool of polymorphic markers identiWed, the second step was to select markers to ensure complete coverage of each cotton linkage group or chromosome.…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent discovery and advances on the analysis of polymorphism in cotton SSRs (Blenda et al, 2006;Chen & Du, 2006;Kebede et al, 2007;Lacape et al, 2007) led to the choice of high polymorphic markers. Microsatellites may be chosen instead of markers based on random PCR amplification because they are relatively easy to reproduce and their location in the genome can also be determined (Blenda et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellites may be chosen instead of markers based on random PCR amplification because they are relatively easy to reproduce and their location in the genome can also be determined (Blenda et al, 2006). Furthermore, microsatellites are easy to perform and cost-effective, in comparison to SNP high-throughput technologies, because they are multiallelic (Gupta et al, 2005) and only a small number of markers are required for the analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SSR markers have proven utility for the resolution diVerences between individuals, mapping traits of interest in experimental populations, analysis of genome evolution and comparative genomics, and for the eYcient utilization of wild and primitive germplasm resources in MAS (Bell and Ecker 1994;Akkaya et al 1995;McCouch et al 1997). A number of cotton SSR containing loci, including more than 500 BNL SSRs (Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY, USA; Blenda et al 2006), 309 JESPR SSRs (Reddy et al 2001) and 418 CIR SSRs (Nguyen et al 2004;Lacape et al 2005) have been identiWed and made available for cotton genome research. Also, EST speciWc microsatellite markers (Qureshi et al, 2004;Han et al 2004;Han et al 2006;Blenda et al 2006), and SSRs derived from bacterial artiWcial chromosomes (BACs) (Yu et al 2002;Yu et al 2004a;Blenda et al 2006) have recently been identiWed in cotton.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%