2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.043526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMB μT cross correlations as a probe of primordial black hole scenarios

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These relations are valid for any single-field models that enhance the spectrum through a brief deviation from the standard attractor era, including cases with a time-varying sound speed and Planck mass. They are accompanied by consistency conditions on the squeezed limit of non-Gaussian higher-order point functions around the dip [227][228][229], as expected in single-field scenarios 22 .…”
Section: The Features Of the Spectrum: Analytic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…These relations are valid for any single-field models that enhance the spectrum through a brief deviation from the standard attractor era, including cases with a time-varying sound speed and Planck mass. They are accompanied by consistency conditions on the squeezed limit of non-Gaussian higher-order point functions around the dip [227][228][229], as expected in single-field scenarios 22 .…”
Section: The Features Of the Spectrum: Analytic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As a result, it can be expected that any higher order correlation function involving the wave number also identically vanishes (for a detailed discussion regarding the dip, see Refs. [58,119,[147][148][149]). We should add that the bispectra also contain additional features that are unique to the nature of the terms in the cubic order action and the corresponding integrals involved in the computation. )…”
Section: Numerical Computation Of the Scalar Bispectrum And The Assoc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This avenue was opened by Pajer & Zaldarriaga ( 2012 ) and Ganc & Komatsu ( 2012 ) and further extended and quantitatively refined in Emami et al ( 2015 ), Ota ( 2016 ), Chluba et al ( 2017 ), Ravenni et al ( 2017 ), and Cabass, Pajer & van der Woude ( 2018 ). Recently it has been shown how the same idea can be applied to models involving primordial black holes ( Özsoy & Tasinato 2021 ; Ze ge ye, Inomata & Hu 2021 ) and to models in which scalar and tensor perturbations are correlated (Orlando, Meerburg & Patil 2022 ). While fainter than the monopole signal, SDAs do not require (Ganc & Komatsu 2012 ) the use of a purposefully built absolutely calibrated spectrometer (Chluba et al 2019 ), ho we ver can be extracted from differential measurement carried out by an imager (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%