1990
DOI: 10.4064/aa-55-2-157-170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CM-fields and exponents of their ideal class groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let d K , k and d k denote the absolute value of the discriminant of CM number field K, the maximal totally real subfield of K and the discriminant of k, then it is known that h k divides h K , and h − K = h K /h k is called the relative class number of K (see [13]). According to the Brauer-Siegel theorem, if K ranges over CM number fields of a given degree then h − K is asymptotic to log( d K /d k ) and goes to infinity with d K (see [5,Lemma 4]). Can we prove that the exponents of the ideal class groups of the CM number fields of a given degree go to infinity with the absolute values of their discriminants?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let d K , k and d k denote the absolute value of the discriminant of CM number field K, the maximal totally real subfield of K and the discriminant of k, then it is known that h k divides h K , and h − K = h K /h k is called the relative class number of K (see [13]). According to the Brauer-Siegel theorem, if K ranges over CM number fields of a given degree then h − K is asymptotic to log( d K /d k ) and goes to infinity with d K (see [5,Lemma 4]). Can we prove that the exponents of the ideal class groups of the CM number fields of a given degree go to infinity with the absolute values of their discriminants?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarks 17. It is possible to deduce from the usual Brauer-Siegel theorem for class numbers of number fields the following Brauer-Siegel-like result for relative class numbers of normal CM-fields, which improves upon [HH,Lemma 4] (which is given only for CM-fields of a given degree) but is less satisfactory than our previous Theorem 14 (for it is ineffective in the case that N contains no imaginary quadratic subfield):…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…By Proposition 1. (1) (2) The computation consists of two steps : (a) Determine all imaginary cyclic number fields of degree 12 with relative class numbers dividing 16 such that its quartic subfield can be embedded into a field N of type (4 * , 2) with h Mu,Corollary 1], [HH,Lemma 10] or [T, Lemma 1]), we have…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%