2003
DOI: 10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0183:cfotmn]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clutch Frequency of the Michoacán Green Seaturtle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of green turtles estimated through tagging and recapture during the 1996/1997 season qualifies Bioko as the second most important nesting area for this species along the Atlantic coast of Africa, after the rookery of Guinea Bissau (Catry et al 2002). We feel that this estimate is robust as: (1) close to 100% of successful nests were recorded, and (2) although beach surveys typically under-estimate clutch frequency (Tucker 2010) our estimated ECF is similar to the one reported in other green turtle nesting studies elsewhere (reviewed by Hirth 1997;Broderick et al 2002;Alvarado-Diaz et al 2003). Following the fieldwork supervised by the author (JT), no systematic surveys were undertaken for two nesting seasons before the work of Rader et al (2006) where a similar methodology was used although there was no resident specialist collating and quality assuring data.…”
Section: Importance Of the Site For Sea Turtle Conservation In Africasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The number of green turtles estimated through tagging and recapture during the 1996/1997 season qualifies Bioko as the second most important nesting area for this species along the Atlantic coast of Africa, after the rookery of Guinea Bissau (Catry et al 2002). We feel that this estimate is robust as: (1) close to 100% of successful nests were recorded, and (2) although beach surveys typically under-estimate clutch frequency (Tucker 2010) our estimated ECF is similar to the one reported in other green turtle nesting studies elsewhere (reviewed by Hirth 1997;Broderick et al 2002;Alvarado-Diaz et al 2003). Following the fieldwork supervised by the author (JT), no systematic surveys were undertaken for two nesting seasons before the work of Rader et al (2006) where a similar methodology was used although there was no resident specialist collating and quality assuring data.…”
Section: Importance Of the Site For Sea Turtle Conservation In Africasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Mean OIP reported for green turtles is ~13 days (range 12–15 days, Hirth ), and mean OIP previously reported for green turtles in Santa Rosa National Park (Cornelius ) and Mexico (Alvarado‐Díaz et al . ) was 12 days. The average OIP in Cabuyal was ~2 days longer (15.4 days) than the reported mean for the species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The underestimation of these values could affect conservation strategies by overestimating the number of females in a population where number of females is estimated by number of nests. Alvarado-Díaz et al (2003) calculated the number of females nesting per year based on OCF ¼ 2.5 and compared it to the number of females nesting per year obtained by estimating it with ECF ¼ 3.1. As a result, the calculated number of females in the population was lower with a greater clutch frequency given the same number of nests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For green turtles, clutch frequency in the Atlantic has been reported to be as high as 6 clutches per season (Bjorndal et al 1999). However, a conspecific, the East Pacific green turtle, is reported to have a clutch frequency of 3 or less for a nesting season (Alvarado-Díaz et al 2003). Even though previous research provides information about estimated number of clutches for all sea turtle species, such information is limited because of incomplete coverage of nesting areas, loss of tags, and loss of individual turtles due to occasional lack of fidelity to nesting beaches (Miller 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation