1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clusters of new identical mutants and the fate of underdominant mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Just because several identical copies of a new allele can theoretically be traced to a premeiotic mutational event does not mean we can ignore the impact this event will have on the makeup of the gene pool. Premeiotic and meiotic mutational events do not contribute to the gene pool with the same magnitude [Woodruff et al, 1996;Huai and Woodruff, 1998], so to argue that clusters of identical new alleles should be counted as one mutation is to falsify the actual genetic phenomenon acting at the population level. Thus, all new mutant alleles, irrespective of origin, should be counted when measuring mutation rate.…”
Section: Table III Examples Of Effect Of Clusters On Spontaneous Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just because several identical copies of a new allele can theoretically be traced to a premeiotic mutational event does not mean we can ignore the impact this event will have on the makeup of the gene pool. Premeiotic and meiotic mutational events do not contribute to the gene pool with the same magnitude [Woodruff et al, 1996;Huai and Woodruff, 1998], so to argue that clusters of identical new alleles should be counted as one mutation is to falsify the actual genetic phenomenon acting at the population level. Thus, all new mutant alleles, irrespective of origin, should be counted when measuring mutation rate.…”
Section: Table III Examples Of Effect Of Clusters On Spontaneous Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%