2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clusters of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in Norwegian hospitals detected by a fully automatic register-based surveillance system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the capture and linkage of existing regional laboratory data and national register data may be automated, it may be possible to expand surveillance without increasing the resource requirements [ 15 ]. Previous work has shown how it is possible to expand surveillance to detect outbreaks and clusters in the healthcare setting through the use of automated algorithms to capture and link existing register data [ 16 , 17 ]. The challenges posed to such an expansion of surveillance include the need for standardised protocols to capture heterogenous laboratory data from multiple sources and ensure the privacy of the patient [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the capture and linkage of existing regional laboratory data and national register data may be automated, it may be possible to expand surveillance without increasing the resource requirements [ 15 ]. Previous work has shown how it is possible to expand surveillance to detect outbreaks and clusters in the healthcare setting through the use of automated algorithms to capture and link existing register data [ 16 , 17 ]. The challenges posed to such an expansion of surveillance include the need for standardised protocols to capture heterogenous laboratory data from multiple sources and ensure the privacy of the patient [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 43 studies included in the analysis [55][56][57], most (n = 16) were published in the last year [11,15,17,18,20,21,26,[28][29][30]32,39,40,46,48,57], four in 2022 [24,31,34,42], six in 2021 [10,27,33,35,37,49], seven in 2020 [12,14,25,36,38,43,44], six in 2019 [13,22,23,41,55,56], and four in 2018 [16,19,45,47]. Despite the year of publication, we also observed the last year in which the study was conducted.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that most of the studies were conducted in 2019 (n = 7, [10,18,20,31,37,41,57]), followed by 2017 (n = 6, [14,22,23,33,44,55,56]), 2018 (n = 6, [17,28,32,34,42,43]), and 2020 (n = 6, [11,15,21,26,27,48]). Only a few studies were conducted in earlier and later years (2021 = 4 [18,24,40,46]; 2022 = 3 [29,30,39]; 2016 = 1 [16]; 2015 = 3 [35,36,38]; 2014 = 1 [19]; 2013 = 2 [12,49]; 2012 = 1 [45]; 2010 = 1 [13]; Unknown = 1 [47]). The mean duration of the studies was 43.7 months (median 38.5; IQR 12-68).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations