2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.18.431337
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ClusterMap: multi-scale clustering analysis of spatial gene expression

Abstract: Quantifying RNAs in their spatial context is crucial to understanding gene expression and regulation in complex tissues. In situ transcriptomic methods generate spatially resolved RNA profiles in intact tissues. However, there is a lack of a unified computational framework for integrative analysis of in situ transcriptomic data. Here, we present an unsupervised and annotation-free framework, termed ClusterMap, which incorporates physical proximity and gene identity of RNAs, formulates the task as a point patte… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the expert annotated structures as the gold standard, STAGATE achieved the best clustering accuracy (ARI = 0.544) compared to other five methods, while SpaGCN ranked the second (ARI = 0.484). Moreover, in light of the connections of the spatial domain identification and the single-cell segmentation (e.g., ClusterMap 37 and Baysor 38 ) designed for image-based ST data, we expect that the idea of STAGATE can be extended to single-cell segmentation task for the ongoing subcellular resolution technologies (e.g., Stereo-seq and PIXEL-seq) in the near future. We also expect to improve its applicability through the usage on datasets generated by new technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the expert annotated structures as the gold standard, STAGATE achieved the best clustering accuracy (ARI = 0.544) compared to other five methods, while SpaGCN ranked the second (ARI = 0.484). Moreover, in light of the connections of the spatial domain identification and the single-cell segmentation (e.g., ClusterMap 37 and Baysor 38 ) designed for image-based ST data, we expect that the idea of STAGATE can be extended to single-cell segmentation task for the ongoing subcellular resolution technologies (e.g., Stereo-seq and PIXEL-seq) in the near future. We also expect to improve its applicability through the usage on datasets generated by new technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaccurate cell segmentation can lead to misassignment of mRNA molecules to cells, leading to errors in downstream analysis such as misclassifying cell types. To overcome this issue, a number of computational tools have been developed to improve the assignment of mRNA molecules to cells ( Qian et al, 2020 ; Prabhakaran et al, 2021 ), incorporate cell typing as part of the segmentation process ( Littman et al, 2021 ), and perform cell-segmentation free analysis ( Petukhov et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2021 ; Park et al, 2021 ). While these tools improve cell typing, they all share the problem of being specialized tools that require access to Linux command line terminals, programming expertise, and high-performance hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transforming the conventional diagnosis strategy for diseases is emerging for ensuring a healthier lifespan (Zhao et al, 2020) and for strengthening drug repurposing (Pushpakom et al, 2019). In the modern era, the practices for diagnosing diseases have been progressively oriented towards precision and personalized, relying on a molecular genetic basis, especially gene expression-based (Aure et al, 2017; He et al, 2021). Since the conventional diagnosis of diseases often remains insufficient in explaining heterogeneity within a disease and the homogeneity between multiple diseases (Humby et al, 2019; Khera & Kathiresan, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%