2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08979-9_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Students Based on Student’s Performance - A Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most education platforms attempt to plan reasonable learning paths for college student users, but they have generally ignored differences in their learning time distribution preferences, learning habits, and learning requirements, and haven't taken the dynamic development trends of their learning states into consideration. Moreover, the generated learning path often does not conform to the cognition sequence of college students, and is not easily accepted or recognized by them, sometimes it can even lead to problems such as cognitive overload, disorientation, and learning efficiency in them [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Therefore, rationally planning the learning path for the personalized and fragmented learning of college students is a very meaningful and practical work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most education platforms attempt to plan reasonable learning paths for college student users, but they have generally ignored differences in their learning time distribution preferences, learning habits, and learning requirements, and haven't taken the dynamic development trends of their learning states into consideration. Moreover, the generated learning path often does not conform to the cognition sequence of college students, and is not easily accepted or recognized by them, sometimes it can even lead to problems such as cognitive overload, disorientation, and learning efficiency in them [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Therefore, rationally planning the learning path for the personalized and fragmented learning of college students is a very meaningful and practical work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are available nowadays. Among them, k-means proposed in MacQueen (1967) has been widely-used in many works (Adjei et al, 2017;Bresfelean et al, 2008;Campagni, Merlini, & Verri, 2014;Jovanovic et al, 2012), while the Partitional Segmentation algorithm in Jayabal and Ramanathan (2014) and the FANNY and AGNES algorithms in Kerr and Chung (2012). Although efficient and effective in some cases, k-means is influenced by the existence of noises and only its intra-cluster compactness is taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bogarín et al [4] used data of the undergraduate students in an online course using Moodle and Zakrzewska [26] got data about the undergraduate and graduate students participating in the experiments in online collaboration also on Moodle, Refs. [5,11,20] clustered the data of undergraduate students and courses in a few years, Jayabal and Ramanathan [12] analyzed the 10th grade data, Kerr and Chung [13] extracted the student performance features from log data in educational video games and simulations, Li and Yoo [15] used the data recorded from each student's actual lab experi-ence, and so on. Among these related works, only Inyang and Joshua [11] has presented the handling of incomplete data by deleting the missing results in the courses while the others had no mention of incomplete data issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the widely used mining tasks, educational data clustering has been considered with many different student-related aspects in [4,5,[11][12][13]15,18,[20][21][22]26] for many various purposes. For example, discovering the groups of similar students is based on study performance in [11], learning behavior in [15], skill in [18], preference in [26], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%