2012
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767312099679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering procedures for the optimal selection of data sets from multiple crystals in macromolecular crystallography

Abstract: The availability of intense microbeam macromolecular crystallography beamlines at third-generation synchrotron sources has enabled data collection and structure solution from microcrystals of <10 mm in size. The increased likelihood of severe radiation damage where microcrystals or particularly sensitive crystals are used forces crystallographers to acquire large numbers of data sets from many crystals of the same protein structure. The associated analysis and merging of multi-crystal data is currently a manua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these diffracted anisotropically to ∼1.8 Å resolution (based on a CC 1/2 cut‐off of 0.3) using the microbeam capability of the beamline 23‐ID_C of the APS. The program Blend was used to combine four of the highest resolution datasets (two of which were derived from the same crystal) to yield the merged dataset extending to an overall resolution of approximately 2.0 Å as described in Table . The structure was solved by molecular replacement based on the previously‐determined lower resolution structure (PDB: 4AW6) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these diffracted anisotropically to ∼1.8 Å resolution (based on a CC 1/2 cut‐off of 0.3) using the microbeam capability of the beamline 23‐ID_C of the APS. The program Blend was used to combine four of the highest resolution datasets (two of which were derived from the same crystal) to yield the merged dataset extending to an overall resolution of approximately 2.0 Å as described in Table . The structure was solved by molecular replacement based on the previously‐determined lower resolution structure (PDB: 4AW6) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual data sets were processed using CCP4 58 but these did not contain sufficient anomalous signal to allow structure determination. All five data sets collected using the MXPressE_SAD method were, therefore, combined and scaled using BLEND 59 to 2 Å resolution. The structure was then successfully determined from the copper anomalous signal using SHELX 60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets were indexed and integrated using XDS (Kabsch, 2010). The datasets indexed with the consistent unit cell parameters were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis based on unit cell similarity using BLEND (Foadi et al, 2013). The clusters of datasets with expected completeness and multiplicity of more than 90% and 2, respectively, were separately merged using XSCALE (Kabsch, 2010) with outlier rejections.…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%