2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2861266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering in Dynamic Causal Networks as a Measure of Systemic Risk on the Euro Zone

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze the dynamic relationships between ten stock exchanges of the euro zone using Granger causal networks. Considering returns for which we allow the variance to follow a Markov-Switching GARCH or a Changing-Point GARCH process, we …rst show that over di¤erent periods, the topology of the network is highly unstable. In particular dynamic relationships vanish over very recent years. Then, expandingon this idea, we analyze patterns of information transmission within the network. Using rollin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our aim is to focus on clustering coefficients. It is noteworthy that several works, contributing to the debate around systemic risk, showed (see [7], [18] and [29]) that the directed clustering coefficient could provide meaningful insights in this context. In particular, in [29] the authors argue that higher clustering of the "in" type may reflect higher systemic risk because failure of the borrowing node in an "in" triangle can trigger simultaneous non-repayments to the lending nodes, and this, in turn, can make them unable to honor their own obligations.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, our aim is to focus on clustering coefficients. It is noteworthy that several works, contributing to the debate around systemic risk, showed (see [7], [18] and [29]) that the directed clustering coefficient could provide meaningful insights in this context. In particular, in [29] the authors argue that higher clustering of the "in" type may reflect higher systemic risk because failure of the borrowing node in an "in" triangle can trigger simultaneous non-repayments to the lending nodes, and this, in turn, can make them unable to honor their own obligations.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It means that interconnections among assets at a given date are not necessarily the same at another one. Against this background, Billio et al (2016) have recently proposed a statistical approach based on Granger causality and MS-GARCH to deal with such dynamic networks. Treating network as information diffusion, they show that some structures inherent to the system, such as the number of connections among stock exchanges and their associated strengths, are regime-dependent.…”
Section: Uncertainty Shocks and Network Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed unlike VAR setting, Granger causal approach is directional but exclusively pairwise and unweighted, tests zero versus non-zero coefficients with somewhat arbitrary significance levels and does not track the magnitude of non-zero coefficients. 12 On the other hand, it is well known that variance decomposition and impulse response analysis may suffer from identifying assumptions inherent to VAR setting. However, this restriction can be partially mitigated by careful robustness checks as we do in the empirical part of the paper.…”
Section: Econometric Framework: Extension Of the Diebold-yilmaz Network Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies employ Granger causality tests in means to construct causality networks among stock indices (Lee and Yang (2014), Billio et al (2016)), sovereign bond yields (Caporin et al (2018)) or multi-partite networks, e.g. combining stocks and sovereign bond yields (Corsi et al (2018)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%