2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering by analytic functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, mean squared error (MSE) [67], as the fitness function of comparative clustering approaches, is introduced in the comparison experiments, which is determined by (12) in the following:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Exisitng Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, mean squared error (MSE) [67], as the fitness function of comparative clustering approaches, is introduced in the comparison experiments, which is determined by (12) in the following:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Exisitng Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In K‐means methods, clusters are groups of data characterized by a small distance to the cluster center. An objective function, typically the sum of the distance to a set of putative cluster centers, is optimized until the best cluster center candidates are found. However, because a data point is always assigned to the nearest center, these approaches are not able to detect non‐spherical clusters …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see, e.g., Boyd and Vandenberghe, 2004;Malinen and Fränti, 2012), instead of solving the problem (5), we can solve the following optimization problem (Kogan, 2007;Teboulle, 2007):…”
Section: K Sabomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention one possibility for the choice of the smoothing parameter > 0 (see also Malinen and Fränti, 2012). If we want a relative deviation…”
Section: -Clustering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%