2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-013-0252-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering-based diversity improvement in top-N recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diversity is generally applied to a set of items to determine how different the items are, and is defined in the literature as the average pairwise dissimilarity between recommended items (Bradley and Smyth, 2001). Diversity in recommendations is divided into two types: individual and aggregate diversity (Aytekin and Karakaya, 2014;Wu et al, 2014). Individual diversity is evaluated by computing the diversity of the recommendation list for a user, while aggregate diversity is calculated by aggregating the diversity of recommendations across all users.…”
Section: Recommendation Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity is generally applied to a set of items to determine how different the items are, and is defined in the literature as the average pairwise dissimilarity between recommended items (Bradley and Smyth, 2001). Diversity in recommendations is divided into two types: individual and aggregate diversity (Aytekin and Karakaya, 2014;Wu et al, 2014). Individual diversity is evaluated by computing the diversity of the recommendation list for a user, while aggregate diversity is calculated by aggregating the diversity of recommendations across all users.…”
Section: Recommendation Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ClusDiv [14] uses clustering to group items in the catalogue from the explicit ratings rather than on item descriptions (although this is not a necessary prerequisite), and recommends items from different clusters. Compared to re-ranking methods such as [9], using item clusters resulted quicker and achieved similar diversification results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a number of recent studies find that beyond accuracy there are other quality factors, which are also important to users. Some researchers focus on diversity and novelty (Adomavicius and Kwon 2012;Aytekin and Karakaya 2014). Some try to recommend long tail items to satisfy users (Park and Tuzhilin 2008).…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%