2023
DOI: 10.3390/e25060835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Analysis of Seismicity in the Anatolian Region with Implications for Seismic Hazard

Davide Zaccagnino,
Luciano Telesca,
Onur Tan
et al.

Abstract: The Anatolian region is one of the most seismically active tectonic settings in the world. Here, we perform a clustering analysis of Turkish seismicity using an updated version of the Turkish Homogenized Earthquake Catalogue (TURHEC), which contains the recent developments of the still ongoing Kahramanmaraş seismic sequence. We show that some statistical properties of seismic activity are related to the regional seismogenic potential. Mapping the local and global coefficients of variation of inter-event times … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the readers' better information, we note that new methods for the estimation of the magnitude distribution parameters have been recently proposed in the literature [85,86]. Moreover, further details on the seismicity of Turkey and its monitoring can be found in [71] and references therein. Since it will be needed later for the analyses presented in Section 3, we also investigated in Figure 2b the completeness of the catalog obtained from AFAD during the period from 1 January 2020 to 1 January 2023 within a 3°× 3°area centered at the actual epicenter of the Kahramanmaraş-Gaziantep M w 7.8 Pazarcik EQ.…”
Section: The Seismic Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the readers' better information, we note that new methods for the estimation of the magnitude distribution parameters have been recently proposed in the literature [85,86]. Moreover, further details on the seismicity of Turkey and its monitoring can be found in [71] and references therein. Since it will be needed later for the analyses presented in Section 3, we also investigated in Figure 2b the completeness of the catalog obtained from AFAD during the period from 1 January 2020 to 1 January 2023 within a 3°× 3°area centered at the actual epicenter of the Kahramanmaraş-Gaziantep M w 7.8 Pazarcik EQ.…”
Section: The Seismic Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractal and multifractal character of such time-series has been studied by Telesca et al [67] and Telesca and Lapenna [68], revealing new properties of seismicity. Recently, the fractal characteristics of seismicity identified by the interevent times have found useful applications to cases of induced seismicity [69], see also [70], as well as in the case of the Anatolian region with implications for seismic hazards before and during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş seismic sequence [71]. Additionally, in forecasting fractal studies, see, e.g., [72,73], declustered catalogs are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Nalbant et al (2002) calculated stress evolution on the EAFZ since 1822 due to tectonic loading, identifying a high-risk fault segment south of Karamanmaraş that could potentially experience a strong earthquake with a magnitude up to Mw7.3. Zaccagnino et al (2023) discovered globally clustered, locally Poissonian seismicity and low b-values in the EAFZ region prior to the earthquake doublet. Picozzi and Iaccarino (2023) employed seismic activity analysis to reveal the gradual migration of earthquake frequency and average energy toward the future epicenter within a 300 km radius for the 300 days leading up to the earthquake doublet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%