2016
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/l7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster–void Degeneracy Breaking: Dark Energy, Planck, and the Largest Cluster and Void

Abstract: for a flat Λ CDM universe, using extreme-value statistics on the claimed largest cluster and void. The Planck-consistent results detect dark energy with two objects, independently of other dark energy probes. Cluster-void studies are also complementary in scale, density, and nonlinearity, and are of particular interest for testing modified-gravity models.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Complementary parameter degeneracies arise between clusters and voids, because they have different sensitivity to structure growth vs. volume expansion with redshift, comoving linear scales, and orthogonal sensitivities between matter disperson σ and Ω m [10,Section 4.5]. While Euclid clusters are better, separately, at constraining structure growth, the void samples are better at constraining the shape of the matter power spectrum.…”
Section: Results Expected Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary parameter degeneracies arise between clusters and voids, because they have different sensitivity to structure growth vs. volume expansion with redshift, comoving linear scales, and orthogonal sensitivities between matter disperson σ and Ω m [10,Section 4.5]. While Euclid clusters are better, separately, at constraining structure growth, the void samples are better at constraining the shape of the matter power spectrum.…”
Section: Results Expected Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a flat wCDM cosmology (i.e., a CDM cosmology with a constant equation of state, w) with a modified gravity model described by a growth index γ (a) = γ 0 + γ 1 (1 − a) (Di Porto et al 2012). The void distribution is modelled following Sahlén et al (2016) and Sahlén & Silk (2018), here also taking into account the galaxy density and bias for each survey (Yahya et al 2015;Raccanelli et al 2016c). The results are shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Radio Weak Lensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SKA2 void number counts could improve on this, down to σ (γ 0 ) = 0.07, σ (γ 1 ) = 0.15. Using the powerful degeneracy-breaking complementarity between clusters of galaxies and voids (Sahlén et al 2016;Sahlén & Silk 2018;Sahlén 2019), SKA2 voids + Euclid clusters number counts could reach σ (γ 0 ) = 0.01, σ (γ 1 ) = 0.07.…”
Section: Radio Weak Lensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predict cluster and void abundances adopting models and methodology developed in earlier work [3,5,22]. As in [5], we include scatter in cluster mass and void radius determinations, and also vary the characteristic void density contrast (through the parameter D v , see below).…”
Section: Cluster and Void Abundance With Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For voids, we model the effect of neutrinos by extending the treatment in [3]. When neutrinos have nonzero mass, the neutrino density contributes to the dynamical evolution of a void, but does not have a significant density contrast on its own, except for voids larger than the neutrino free-streaming length [e.g.…”
Section: Void Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%