2003
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster stability scores for microarray data in cancer studies

Abstract: BackgroundA potential benefit of profiling of tissue samples using microarrays is the generation of molecular fingerprints that will define subtypes of disease. Hierarchical clustering has been the primary analytical tool used to define disease subtypes from microarray experiments in cancer settings. Assessing cluster reliability poses a major complication in analyzing output from clustering procedures. While most work has focused on estimating the number of clusters in a dataset, the question of stability of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantitatively evaluate the degree of module preservation, we carried out a Z-summary test (Methods). Alternative statistics are available to assess the quality and reproducibility of clusters among datasets [ 33 , 54 - 58 ]. An advantage of the Zsummary statistic is that it allows for significance thresholds: Z-summary <2 indicates no significant module preservation; 2<Z-summary<10 indicates moderate preservation; and, Z-summary>10 indicates strong preservation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively evaluate the degree of module preservation, we carried out a Z-summary test (Methods). Alternative statistics are available to assess the quality and reproducibility of clusters among datasets [ 33 , 54 - 58 ]. An advantage of the Zsummary statistic is that it allows for significance thresholds: Z-summary <2 indicates no significant module preservation; 2<Z-summary<10 indicates moderate preservation; and, Z-summary>10 indicates strong preservation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative statistics are available to assess the quality and reproducibility of clusters among data sets. 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 Our previous work outlined 7 simulation scenarios in which we compared WGCNA's module preservation statistics with the hitherto best-performing alternative approach, and the Z-summary statistic had distinct advantages when it came to studying the preservation of network modules. 29 , 34 Detailed discussions of the pros and cons of these statistics were presented recently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even though the molecular profiles of samples from one cancer subtype tend to occupy a common dendrogram cluster, there is significant admixing with samples from different cancer subtypes. Cluster configurations resulting from hierarchical algorithms are generally not well defined since they vary depending upon the input order of the same data [ 15 , 16 ] and are often irreproducible [ 17 ]. More importantly, hierarchical clustering (or any purely correlative technique) alone does not provide a rational biological basis for disease classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%