2010
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2010.2049179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster-Based Distributed Face Tracking in Camera Networks

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we present a distributed multicamera face tracking system suitable for large wired camera networks. Unlike previous multicamera face tracking systems, our system does not require a central server to coordinate the entire tracking effort. Instead, an efficient camera clustering protocol is used to dynamically form groups of cameras for in-network tracking of individual faces. The clustering protocol includes cluster propagation mechanisms that allow the computational load of face trackin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though communication latency is targeted by handling relevant data across cameras, the amount of data produced can still overwhelm the network if a sound communication strategy is not available. Similar to our work clustering has been proposed in [30] as a means to reduce the amount of messaging in a network of collaborative cameras. The method differs, however, to our approach in that it is limited to face recognition, while we target collaborative tracking with a combination of hardware acceleration and middleware.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Even though communication latency is targeted by handling relevant data across cameras, the amount of data produced can still overwhelm the network if a sound communication strategy is not available. Similar to our work clustering has been proposed in [30] as a means to reduce the amount of messaging in a network of collaborative cameras. The method differs, however, to our approach in that it is limited to face recognition, while we target collaborative tracking with a combination of hardware acceleration and middleware.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Coalition formation requires identifying the best cameras over time. Moreover, collaboration costs of forming and operating camera coalitions are generally not defined [11] [13][7][9] [14], thus limiting the use of existing approaches in resource-constrained camera networks.…”
Section: Sanmiguel and Andrea Cavallaromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greedy approaches reduce such complexity by sequentially expanding the coalition only with cameras maximizing certain criteria [9][10]. Centralized approaches need Decentralized rankings select top-ranked cameras based on camera-target distance [11] or feature matching such as orientation [13]. Distance-based criteria require accurate target state estimations to create coalitions whereas feature-based criteria rely on matching accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research in this field has been focused on distributed tracking, resource allocation, activity recognition and active sensing. Yoder et al [43] track multiple faces in a wireless camera network. The observations of multiple cameras are integrated using a minimum variance estimator and tracked using a Kalman filter.…”
Section: Multi-view-based Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%