2005
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4582-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster at the Magnetospheric Cusps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. and also Cargill et al (2005); Grison et al (2005)). Smaller scale velocity fluctuations re-appear at about 05:35 UT and persist throughout the rest of the interval.…”
Section: Total Integrated Power Of Magnetic Field Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. and also Cargill et al (2005); Grison et al (2005)). Smaller scale velocity fluctuations re-appear at about 05:35 UT and persist throughout the rest of the interval.…”
Section: Total Integrated Power Of Magnetic Field Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The first harmonic of the fundamental frequency is also observable from both FGM and STAFF. Because of the better sensitivity at higher frequencies, STAFF can also detect the 2nd, 3rd and 4th harmonics (see also Cargill et al, 2005).…”
Section: Analysis Methods Of Cusp Magnetic Field Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the CMEs started with a weak front end, its impact compressed and deformed the magnetosphere such that Cluster, which was in the southern magnetospheric lobe, suddenly found itself in the magnetosheath. Such compressions of the magnetopause by comparatively small changes in the solar wind pressure have been reported earlier (e.g., Cargill et al, 2005;Balan et al, 2006). While Cluster was crossing the compressed magnetosheath under steady solar wind pressure and steady velocity components, IMF B y became zero for about 1.5 h when the magnetosphere shifted back to the Cluster position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…ion average energy decreases with decreasing latitude, is understood as a consequence of the reconnection poleward of the cusp, and hence is regarded as a typical ion feature in northward-IMF cusp [20,21]. Variations of the reconnection at the magnetopause sometimes could induce dispersion structures in the cusp [22][23][24], such as the "saw tooth" dispersion and "cusp ion step".…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%