2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-016-9797-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster-associated filling of water molecules in graphene-based mesopores

Abstract: Graphene monoliths were prepared through unidirectional freeze-drying method of graphene oxide colloids-KOH mixed solution and successive reduction by heating at 573 K in Ar. The porosity-and crystallinitycontrolled graphene monoliths were prepared by the KOH activation at different temperature and the post-heating in Ar. These activated graphene monoliths were characterized by N 2 adsorption at 77 K, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Water adsorption isotherms show a typical hydrophobicity below P/P 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering intensity decreased due to the reduction of electron deviation occurred by uniform adsorption; on the contrary, the intensity increased due to the density biasing in pores, which happened by the cluster formation. 50,51) Figure 8 presents the scattering intensity as a function of water content since the fractional filling could be considered as 1 under the assumption in this study. From above, the initial decrease of intensity with water content indicates the bias of electron density in the space, which was alleviated by the discrete entry of water molecules into nanopores.…”
Section: The Structure Behavior Obtained From Saxsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattering intensity decreased due to the reduction of electron deviation occurred by uniform adsorption; on the contrary, the intensity increased due to the density biasing in pores, which happened by the cluster formation. 50,51) Figure 8 presents the scattering intensity as a function of water content since the fractional filling could be considered as 1 under the assumption in this study. From above, the initial decrease of intensity with water content indicates the bias of electron density in the space, which was alleviated by the discrete entry of water molecules into nanopores.…”
Section: The Structure Behavior Obtained From Saxsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion interaction between water and graphite is extremely weak and water would not adsorb on a bare graphite surface at ambient temperatures; the weak quadrupole at each C site does not contribute any significant electrostatic addition to the potential energy because the close proximity of the sites means that positive and negative terms tend to cancel out. Nevertheless, the presence of functional groups at the edges of graphene layers or at surface defects facilitate wetting since these act as strong adsorption sites for water molecules [1,2] and it is well-known that water molecules cluster around functional groups carrying electrostatic partial charges [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The interaction between water and these strong sites is greater than or, at least comparable to, the interaction between water molecules and is significantly stronger than the interaction between water and the basal plane of graphite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion interaction between water and graphite is extremely weak and water would not adsorb on a bare graphite surface at ambient temperatures ( Figure 2-1a); the weak quadrupole at each carbon site does not contribute any significant electrostatic addition to the potential energy because the close proximity of the sites means that positive and negative terms tend to cancel out. Nevertheless, the presence of functional groups at the edges of graphene layers or at surface defects facilitate wetting since these act as strong adsorption sites for water molecules [26,27] and it is well-known that water molecules cluster around functional groups carrying electrostatic partial charges [11,14,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Effect Of Adsorbate On Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%