2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster and principal component analysis for Kováts’ retention indices on apolar and polar stationary phases in gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The betweengroups linkage or the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) technique, which defines the distance between two clusters as the average of all the pairs of distances between elements of both clusters, was adopted. 24,31,32 Similarities and dissimilarities were quantified by Square Euclidean distance measurements. The data analysis was realized using the SPSS v.13.0 statistical package (SPSS, 2005).…”
Section: Multivariate Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The betweengroups linkage or the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) technique, which defines the distance between two clusters as the average of all the pairs of distances between elements of both clusters, was adopted. 24,31,32 Similarities and dissimilarities were quantified by Square Euclidean distance measurements. The data analysis was realized using the SPSS v.13.0 statistical package (SPSS, 2005).…”
Section: Multivariate Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biplots associated to the QSRR model for Z and U are almost identical according to the fact that the same set of molecular descriptors was selected, and the two responses are highly correlated, therefore, PCA results referring to the first case were not reported in Figure 4. PCA also offers a graphical tool to rank the chromatographic phases, this approach being already used to classify the columns based on various kind of empirical descriptors [9,21,30,31]. It must be noted that the plots displayed in Figure 4 do not change appreciably if the experimental response is removed from the variable set subjected to PCA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades, the motivation for applying variable selection techniques in quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR) has shifted from being an illustrative example to becoming a real prerequisite for model building . In contrast to other dimensionality reduction techniques like those based on projection or compression, variable selection techniques do not alter the origin representation of the variables, but merely select a subset of them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%