Cluster analysis-based clinical phenotypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: associations with acute exacerbation and overall survival

Abstract

Background The precise classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is essential for selecting treatment as well as estimating clinical outcomes; however, this is sometimes difficult in clinical practice. Therefore, cluster analysis was used to identify the clinical phenotypes of IIPs, and its usefulness for predicting clinical outcomes was evaluated. Methods Cluster analysis was performed using clinical features including patients’ demographics; histories; pulmonary function test data; and laboratory, physical and radiological findings. Results In 337 patients with IIPs, four clusters were identified: Cluster I, in which > 80% of the patients had autoimmune features; Cluster II, which had the lowest rate of smoking, the lowest percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and the lowest body mass index (BMI); Cluster III, which had the highest rate of smoking, the highest rate of dust exposure, the second lowest %FVC and normal BMI; and Cluster IV, which exhibited maintenance of %FVC and normal BMI. Cluster IV had significantly longer overall survival than Clusters II and III. Clusters I and III had significantly longer overall survival than Cluster II. Clusters II and III had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of acute exacerbation than Cluster IV. Conclusion Cluster analysis using clinical features identified four clinical phenotypes of IIPs, which may be useful for predicting the risk of acute exacerbation and overall survival.

Clusters of comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

“…These findings support the robustness of our results. Aoshima et al performed cluster analyses on a variety of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, including 94 IPF patients, and described four clusters [40]. Clustering was based on age, gender, smoking, FVC and laboratory data, but only included a single comorbidity (emphysema).…”