Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Triangulated Categories 2010
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139107075.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster algebras, quiver representations and triangulated categories

Abstract: Abstract. This is an introduction to some aspects of Fomin-Zelevinsky's cluster algebras and their links with the representation theory of quivers and with Calabi-Yau triangulated categories. It is based on lectures given by the author at summer schools held in 2006 (Bavaria) and 2008 (Jerusalem). In addition to by now classical material, we present the outline of a proof of the periodicity conjecture for pairs of Dynkin diagrams (details will appear elsewhere) and recent results on the interpretation of mutat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
271
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
271
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the category D Mod Q T is not abelian in general. By a result of Bernhard Keller [9], it is a triangulated category. We can also construct the total category C generated by all the diagonals of the (n + 3) polygon.…”
Section: The Orbit Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the category D Mod Q T is not abelian in general. By a result of Bernhard Keller [9], it is a triangulated category. We can also construct the total category C generated by all the diagonals of the (n + 3) polygon.…”
Section: The Orbit Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our way of understanding the cluster algebra C[N ] via the category mod(Λ) is very similar to the approach of [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [28] which study cluster algebras attached to quivers via some new cluster categories. There are however two main differences.…”
Section: A λ-Module M Is Called Rigid Provided Extmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fomin and Zelevinsky proved it for a special case (level 2 case in our terminology) [FZ3] by the cluster algebra approach [FZ1,FZ2,FZ4]. Since then, a remarkable link has been established between cluster algebras and cluster categories of the quiver representations (See [BMRRT,BMR,CC,CK1,CK2,Kel2] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%