2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clumpy shocks as the driver of velocity dispersion in molecular clouds: the effects of self-gravity and magnetic fields

Abstract: We revisit an alternate explanation for the turbulent nature of molecular cloudsnamely, that velocity dispersions matching classical predictions of driven turbulence can be generated by the passage of clumpy material through a shock. While previous work suggested this mechanism can reproduce the observed Larson relation between velocity dispersion and size scale (σ ∝ L Γ with Γ ≈ 0.5), the effects of self-gravity and magnetic fields were not considered. We run a series of smoothed particle magnetohydrodynamics… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the differences between two-phase and WNM colliding flows is that the two-phase colliding flows are highly inhomogeneous. Our results showed that the inhomogeneity of colliding flows enhances longitudinal velocity dispersion for θ ∼ 0 • (also see Inoue & Inutsuka 2012;Carroll-Nellenback et al 2014;Forgan & Bonnell 2018). We also found density enhancement for θ ∼ 0 • in the models where the field strength is relatively large and the Alfvén Mach number of the colliding flow is close to unity in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…One of the differences between two-phase and WNM colliding flows is that the two-phase colliding flows are highly inhomogeneous. Our results showed that the inhomogeneity of colliding flows enhances longitudinal velocity dispersion for θ ∼ 0 • (also see Inoue & Inutsuka 2012;Carroll-Nellenback et al 2014;Forgan & Bonnell 2018). We also found density enhancement for θ ∼ 0 • in the models where the field strength is relatively large and the Alfvén Mach number of the colliding flow is close to unity in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 77%