Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis 2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107415324.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clouds and Aerosols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

23
466
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 780 publications
(495 citation statements)
references
References 656 publications
(850 reference statements)
23
466
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2a, 3a). Strong aerosol cooling is supported by Rotstayn et al (2015), who found that ACCESS1.3 showed a large globalmean aerosol effective radiative forcing over the historical period of −1.56 W m −2 , which is much larger than the IPCC best estimate (−0.9 W m −2 ) (Boucher et al, 2013) but still within the uncertainty range.…”
Section: Land Temperature and Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2a, 3a). Strong aerosol cooling is supported by Rotstayn et al (2015), who found that ACCESS1.3 showed a large globalmean aerosol effective radiative forcing over the historical period of −1.56 W m −2 , which is much larger than the IPCC best estimate (−0.9 W m −2 ) (Boucher et al, 2013) but still within the uncertainty range.…”
Section: Land Temperature and Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the perturbation of the radiation fields by dust aerosols, the energy budget both at the surface and in the atmosphere is modified and the signal of these impacts is evident in atmospheric stability or instability conditions associated with cloud development and precipitation. These rapid adjustments, which have been referred to earlier as semi-direct effects (Hansen et al, 1997), are induced by the dust REari on surface energy budget and atmospheric profile (Boucher et al, 2013) contributing to the effective radiative forcing (ERFari). Moreover, dust aerosols, due to their ability to serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nuclei (IN), modify the physical (Twomey, 1974;Albrecht, 1989) and optical properties of clouds (Pincus and Baker, 1994), which consist of the major regulators of the Earth-atmosphere system's radiation budget (Lohmann and Feicher, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced perturbation of the radiation fields by dust particles, the so-called dust radiative effect, takes place through three processes of increasing complexity affecting the energy budgets at the surface, in the atmosphere and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). The first one, known as direct radiative effect (DRE) and referred as REari (aerosolradiation interactions) in the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, Boucher et al, 2013), is caused by the absorption and scattering of the SW radiation (Sokolik et al, 2001) and the absorption and reemission of the LW radiation by mineral particles (Heinold et al, 2008). Due to the perturbation of the radiation fields by dust aerosols, the energy budget both at the surface and in the atmosphere is modified and the signal of these impacts is evident in atmospheric stability or instability conditions associated with cloud development and precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precise understanding of their properties and processes therefore is necessary to properly address current uncertainties of climate change estimates (Boucher et al, 2013). In particular, the impact of ice clouds on the Earth's 20 radiation budget is recognized as being substantial (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%