2008
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-1231-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud type comparisons of AIRS, CloudSat, and CALIPSO cloud height and amount

Abstract: Abstract. The precision of the two-layer cloud height fields derived from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) is explored and quantified for a five-day set of observations. Coincident profiles of vertical cloud structure by CloudSat, a 94 GHz profiling radar, and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO), are compared to AIRS for a wide range of cloud types. Bias and variability in cloud height differences are shown to have dependence on cloud type, height, and amount,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the "radiative" height determined by the AIRS-LMD retrieval corresponds well to the height of the maximum backscatter signal and of the "apparent middle" of the cloud. A comparison of the cloud height provided by the AIRS L2 products with CALIPSO exhibits a strong negative bias in the cloud pressure of low clouds, in agreement with a study of Kahn et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the "radiative" height determined by the AIRS-LMD retrieval corresponds well to the height of the maximum backscatter signal and of the "apparent middle" of the cloud. A comparison of the cloud height provided by the AIRS L2 products with CALIPSO exhibits a strong negative bias in the cloud pressure of low clouds, in agreement with a study of Kahn et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The range of retrieved p cld is much smaller than for AIRS-LMD, with large negative biases for low clouds. These biases have already been revealed in (Kahn et al, 2008;Stubenrauch et al, 2008). In polar latitudes the peak is even shifted to −100 hPa and the tail is even larger.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Airs-lmd Cloud Heightmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Over the years, AIRS data sets have matured considerably, and a wealth of literature on the validation of AIRS retrievals is now available (e.g. Divakarla et al, 2006;Gettelman et al, 2006;Kahn et al, 2008). The L3 standard product has previously been used for studying large-scale climatic features over the high latitudes (Devasthale et al, 2010(Devasthale et al, , 2011Sedlar and Devasthale, 2012).…”
Section: Airs Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By including or constraining h t in the retrieval, it improves the IWP retrieval. Other approaches, e.g., using IR channels from the CO 2 slicing method (Kahn et al, 2008) may be used in the future to constrain h t in the IWP retrieval. As seen in Fig.…”
Section: Empirical T Cir -Iwp Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%