2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud temperature measurement using rotational Raman lidar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLN is comprised of lidar facilities at mainly 4 sites (campuses) supported by the NOAA CREST Center (see Fig.1 [5,6,7]. The high pulse powers allow the observation and quantification of multi-layer plumes; and the multiwavelength capacity enables us to classify aloft aerosol type (smoke or dust).…”
Section: Lidar System and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLN is comprised of lidar facilities at mainly 4 sites (campuses) supported by the NOAA CREST Center (see Fig.1 [5,6,7]. The high pulse powers allow the observation and quantification of multi-layer plumes; and the multiwavelength capacity enables us to classify aloft aerosol type (smoke or dust).…”
Section: Lidar System and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid these drawbacks, in recent field deployments the second cascading filter was removed from the Lo-J channel, and we were fully aware that this would have determined an overall lower blocking at 354.7 nm for the Lo-J interference filter and a consequent crosstalk of the 354.7 nm elastic lidar signal into the Lo-J rotational Raman signal. However, we were also fully aware of the different research efforts and corresponding literature papers dedicated to the definition of approaches to identify and remove elastic signal leakages from the rotational Raman signals (Behrendt et al, 2002;Su et al, 2013). These authors demonstrated that elastic signal crosstalk into the Lo-J rotational Raman signals can be completely removed if simultaneous and co-located measurements of the elastic signal are available.…”
Section: Elastic Signal Crosstalk Into the Rotational Raman Signals Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors demonstrated that elastic signal crosstalk into the Lo-J rotational Raman signals can be completely removed if simultaneous and co-located measurements of the elastic signal are available. Behrendt et al (2002) tested their approach on a rotational Raman lidar operating at 532 nm, while Su et al (2013) applied their approach to a rotational Raman lidar operating at 354.7 nm. At 354.7 nm, the approach considers the following equation: with P leak LoJ (z) being the leaked Lo-J rotational Raman lidar signal, P LoJ (z) being the effective Lo-J rotational Raman lidar signal used for the derivation of temperature profiles, P 354.7 (z) being the 354.7 nm elastic lidar signal, T F being the transmission of neutral density filters (used to attenuate the elastic signals and avoid signal induced noise effects associated with the low range echoes), and k being the crosstalk factor.…”
Section: Elastic Signal Crosstalk Into the Rotational Raman Signals Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (Di Girolamo et al, 2004), of the University of Hohenheim (UHOH; Radlach et al, 2008), of the University of Basilicata (Di Girolamo et al, 2009), of Xi'an University (Mao et al, 2009), and of Hampton University (Su et al, 2013) all operate in the UV with interference-filter polychromators. Rotational Raman lidars at 532 nm show lower performance during daytime but reach a larger range at night than an UV system due to the higher laser power available at 532 nm compared to 355 nm, higher efficiency in signal separation, and lower atmospheric extinction.…”
Section: E Hammann Et Al: Temperature Profiling With Rotational Rammentioning
confidence: 99%