1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud processing of soluble gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, a consistent fraction of cloud samples have consistent solute concentrations between 18 and 50 mg l −1 . These concentrations are slightly lower than ionic concentrations measured at mountain sites under the influence of medium range pollution, such as Great Dun Fell (23 mg l −1 just for sulphate, Laj et al, 1997b), Aubure in the Vosges Mountains (eastern France; 66 mg l −1 measured by , Whiteface Mountain (60 mg l −1 Khwaja et al, 1995) and the eastern part of United States (Weathers al., 1988). This also corresponds to the range of concentrations found during the CIME campaign, and to levels measured by Voisin et al (2000) at PDD.…”
Section: Inorganic Substancesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1, a consistent fraction of cloud samples have consistent solute concentrations between 18 and 50 mg l −1 . These concentrations are slightly lower than ionic concentrations measured at mountain sites under the influence of medium range pollution, such as Great Dun Fell (23 mg l −1 just for sulphate, Laj et al, 1997b), Aubure in the Vosges Mountains (eastern France; 66 mg l −1 measured by , Whiteface Mountain (60 mg l −1 Khwaja et al, 1995) and the eastern part of United States (Weathers al., 1988). This also corresponds to the range of concentrations found during the CIME campaign, and to levels measured by Voisin et al (2000) at PDD.…”
Section: Inorganic Substancesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Numerous studies have investigated gas/liquid phase partitioning in clouds and fogs, with nearly all showing significant discrepancies, both supersaturation and subsaturation, between measured aqueous concentrations and expected concentrations based on Henry's law equilibrium with the gas phase (Acker et al, 2008;Moore et al, 2004b;Sellegri et al, 2003;Jaeschke et al, 1998;Laj et al, 1997;Winiwarter et al, 1994;Facchini et al, 1992a;1992b;Winiwarter et al, 1992;Pandis and Seinfeld, 1991;Winiwarter et al, 1988;Jacob et al, 1986). These studies have shown that deviations from equilibrium can result from mixing of droplets that are individually in equilibrium with the gas phase, variations in liquid water content over the course of the sampling period, mass transfer limitations, or some combination of these phenomena.…”
Section: Charge Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass is added to aerosols as they pass through clouds by a variety of processes, summarised in Table 1 along with abbreviations that will be used throughout this paper. The uptake of gas-phase species (DISS) such as H 2 SO 4 , HCl, HNO 3 and ammonia can contribute the majority of in-cloud mass gain in some conditions (Flynn et al, 2000), but the aqueous oxidation of SO 2 to sulfate in cloud droplets (AQOX) is generally considered to be the most important in-cloud mass production pathway (Bradbury et al, 1999;Laj et al, 1997a, b;Mertes et al, 2005a). SO 2 is oxidised to sulfate in the aqueous phase by O 3 , H 2 O 2 and transition metal-catalysed oxidation by O 2 (Sander et al, 1995;Bower et al, 1997).…”
Section: E Harris Et Al: Cloud Processing During Hcct-2010mentioning
confidence: 99%