2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020ms002359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud Process Coupling and Time Integration in the E3SM Atmosphere Model

Abstract: Introduction Time Step Sensitivity in Atmospheric General Circulation ModelsTime integration strategies for atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) have grown more complex, both due to an increase in the number of separate processes within a model (allowing individual parameterizations to adopt different time integration strategies from the "host" model) and due to changes in process coupling. The latter include modifications that allow different processes to be run concurrently (Balaji et al., 2016;Don… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2021) and Santos et al. (2021) found large changes in cloud properties when a variety of timesteps were changed in the E3SM Atmospheric Model, including the physics timestep itself and the sub‐cycling of various moist processes within the physics package. Even in superparameterized (Yu & Pritchard, 2015) and convective‐permitting (Barrett et al., 2019) simulations, timestep sensitivity has been noted in the simulation of clouds and precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2021) and Santos et al. (2021) found large changes in cloud properties when a variety of timesteps were changed in the E3SM Atmospheric Model, including the physics timestep itself and the sub‐cycling of various moist processes within the physics package. Even in superparameterized (Yu & Pritchard, 2015) and convective‐permitting (Barrett et al., 2019) simulations, timestep sensitivity has been noted in the simulation of clouds and precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herrington and Reed (2018) argued that long physics timesteps in idealized simulations exacerbated time truncation errors and resulted in a decoupling of analytic relationships between grid spacing and resolved vertical motions. Both Wan et al (2021) and Santos et al (2021) found large changes in cloud properties when a variety of timesteps were changed in the E3SM Atmospheric Model, including the physics timestep itself and the sub-cycling of various moist processes within the physics package. Even in superparameterized (Yu & Pritchard, 2015) and convective-permitting (Barrett et al, 2019) simulations, timestep sensitivity has been noted in the simulation of clouds and precipitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%