1985
DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(85)90323-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud optical thickness feedbacks in the CO2 climate problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(18 reference statements)
5
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large changes in cloud radiative effect on the surface energy budget occur in coupled climate models due to cloud phase and microphysics changes (34), temperature effects on adiabatic water content (35)(36)(37), and changes in large-scale moisture convergence and evaporation (29). Furthermore, observations of internal variability and trends indicate that a warmer Arctic will also likely be cloudier in winter (38,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large changes in cloud radiative effect on the surface energy budget occur in coupled climate models due to cloud phase and microphysics changes (34), temperature effects on adiabatic water content (35)(36)(37), and changes in large-scale moisture convergence and evaporation (29). Furthermore, observations of internal variability and trends indicate that a warmer Arctic will also likely be cloudier in winter (38,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the planetary radiation balance simulated with microphysics is no more accurate than that simulated without microphysics, the treatment of cloud microphysics in the GCM is still preferred, because the additional feedback mechanisms represented with microphysics make the microphysics version more versatile for climate sensitivity studies. The sensitivity of cloud water to temperature [Somerville and Remer, 1984] can be treated in a physically based manner. By distinguishing cloud water and cloud ice, cloud radiative properties are more realistic than those in the NCAR version, so that the sensitivity of cloud particle phase (and hence cloud reflectivity and settling velocity) to temperature can be treated [Smith, 1990].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud-scale average condensate mixing ratio within individual cloud elements has been shown, in both observational and theoretical studies (e.g., Feigelson, 1978;Somerville and Remer, 1984;Betts and Harshvardhan, 1987;Platt and Harshvardhan, 1988), to vary systematically with temperature; these cloud-scale average mixing ratios are controlled by microphysical and small-scale cloud-dynamical processes, and so should be amenable to semi-empirical parameterization.…”
Section: Fractional Cloudinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the variability of cloud optical properties with temperature and other atmospheric state variables is now being recognized as a potentially important aspect of cloudclimate feedback (e.g., Somerville and Remer, 1984;Platt and Harshvardhan, 1988). New, physically based fractional cloudiness schemes (e.g., Randall, 1987) are linking cloud amount with turbulence variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%