2022
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2022.3186662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud Feature Extraction and Fluctuation Pattern Recognition Based Ultrashort-Term Regional PV Power Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Tsai et al [27], the authors compared multiple GHI forecasting methods, including the hybrid nowcasting presented in Hu et al [9]. The hybrid model taking cloud movement into account is shown to achieve comparable accuracy to other methods, as the mean average percentage error (MAPE) of the method was 7.8%, which is within the same order of magnitude as more complex methods, such as the CNN and LSTM combination network published in the study by Wang et al in [28]. They achieved a 4% relative mean average error (rMAE), while its resource requirements remained very low.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a study by Tsai et al [27], the authors compared multiple GHI forecasting methods, including the hybrid nowcasting presented in Hu et al [9]. The hybrid model taking cloud movement into account is shown to achieve comparable accuracy to other methods, as the mean average percentage error (MAPE) of the method was 7.8%, which is within the same order of magnitude as more complex methods, such as the CNN and LSTM combination network published in the study by Wang et al in [28]. They achieved a 4% relative mean average error (rMAE), while its resource requirements remained very low.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the research on total DPV power forecasting is more meaningful for the safe and stable operation of the distribution network. A variety of methods have been proposed for regional PV power forecasting, which can be generally divided into (1) forecasting-accumulation methods, which first forecast the output power of each PV site in a region and then aggregate the forecasting results to obtain the regional PV output [17,18]; (2) accumulation-forecasting methods, which first aggregate the PV power of each site to obtain the total regional output, and then use the regional output as input to forecast the regional PV output [19]; (3) clustering-forecasting-accumulation methods, which first group the regional sites into several clusters according to certain rules, the sum of the power over each cluster is then obtained, and forecast the power for each cluster, finally aggregate the forecasting result of each cluster to get the regional power [20]. (4) Up-scaling methods, which first establish the mapping relationship between some representative sites and the total output of the entire region, so that the PV output of the entire region can be more accurately predicted only relying on the data of part sites [21,22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, let i = j, that is, the number of rows and columns remains the same, ranging from 2 to 14. Since not all subgrids have DPV sites, the numbers of the selected sites are i ∈ [4,8,14,19,25,33,39,50,56,67,78,86,98].…”
Section: The Influence Of Nodes' Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, for more study about the prediction for PVs, refs. [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] can be studied.…”
Section: Pv Output Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%