The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2889677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud Detection in Remote Sensing Images Based on Multiscale Features-Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current cloudy image, a mask map of clouds and cloud shadows, and a cloudless recent image of the same area were prepared in advance as the input. The mask map, which was a binary map where 1 represented the clean pixels (black), and 0 represents the clouds and cloud shadows (white), can be generated from recent CNN-based detection methods [43][44][45] or manual work. When an automatic algorithm was applied, the recall rate should be set high to detect most of the clouds; however, a relatively lower precision score will not affect the performance of the cloud removal task as a large number of clean pixels remain to train the cloud removal network.…”
Section: The Overall Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current cloudy image, a mask map of clouds and cloud shadows, and a cloudless recent image of the same area were prepared in advance as the input. The mask map, which was a binary map where 1 represented the clean pixels (black), and 0 represents the clouds and cloud shadows (white), can be generated from recent CNN-based detection methods [43][44][45] or manual work. When an automatic algorithm was applied, the recall rate should be set high to detect most of the clouds; however, a relatively lower precision score will not affect the performance of the cloud removal task as a large number of clean pixels remain to train the cloud removal network.…”
Section: The Overall Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is unreasonable to select the training samples using fixed scale. In this study, we used the super-pixel segments to construct samples database based on image interpretation at different scale (20 × 20, 40 × 40 and 60 × 60) (Shao et al 2019). In this way we not only improved the efficiency of collecting training samples, but greatly increased the number and type of samples, which contributed to improve the classification accuracy.…”
Section: Collection Of Multiscale Damage Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies that estimate AGB at a small scale use medium and high spatial resolution remote sensing data, such as Landsat TM [27], SPOT [28], [29] or Quickbird [30]; however, these data have low temporal resolution. Remote sensing data are easily affected by meteorological factors such as clouds [31], [32]. Processing the data requires significant computing power, and data acquisition is expensive, hence, the AGB estimation at a large scale is not a straightforward task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%