2018
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1472367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud condensation nuclei from the activation with ozone of soot particles sampled from a kerosene diffusion flame

Abstract: Due to the exponential increase in aircraft traffic in recent decades, the role of soot particles emitted by aircraft engines on the radiative forcing needs to be addressed, and especially their interaction with clouds has to be better understood and quantified. In this work, we investigate the hygroscopic properties of fresh and aged soot sampled on line in a kerosene flame. The activated fraction (F a) of size selected soot is measured by means of a variable supersaturation condensation nucleus counter at se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(112 reference statements)
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The general finding agrees with literature results underlining the applicability of the CSTR-approach. Nevertheless, the activation supersaturation in our experiments is significantly lower at the same O3-10 exposures compared to results obtained in other experimental setups (Grimonprez et al, 2018;Lambe et al, 2015). The soot rich in OC (CBW) demanded 2 to 4 times less aging time (tact = 3 -6 h at 1.4 % SSact) than soot lean in OC (CBK, tact = 12 h at 1.4 % SSact).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The general finding agrees with literature results underlining the applicability of the CSTR-approach. Nevertheless, the activation supersaturation in our experiments is significantly lower at the same O3-10 exposures compared to results obtained in other experimental setups (Grimonprez et al, 2018;Lambe et al, 2015). The soot rich in OC (CBW) demanded 2 to 4 times less aging time (tact = 3 -6 h at 1.4 % SSact) than soot lean in OC (CBK, tact = 12 h at 1.4 % SSact).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, particle diameters and particle compositions vary across studies. If the cumulative O3-exposure, the product of the O3-concentration and the exposure time, is taken as a metric for comparison, 100 nm diameter CBK particles in our study (SSact = 1.6 % after 4.9 × 10 16 molec•s•cm -3 O3-exposure) show CCNactivity within the same order of magnitude as 150 nm kerosene diffusion flame soot particles investigated by Grimonprez et al, (2018) (SScrit = 1.4 % after 10 × 10 16 molec•s•cm -3 O3-exposure) and as 222 nm ethylene premix flame soot particle 30 (SScrit = 1.5 % after 5 × 10 16 molec•s•cm -3 O3-exposure; Lambe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ccn-activitymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a large variability in size distribution, morphology and chemical composition strongly impacts the reactivity of soot particles in the atmosphere and their propensity to evolve into CCN. Several studies exist that characterize the CCN activity of soot particles generated in the exhaust of laboratory flames (Lambe et al, 2015) and commercial burners like the miniCAST (Henning et al, 2012;Friebel et al, 2019). Soot particle aging experiments are often performed in laboratory conditions that simulate the atmosphere and make use of flow reactors (Kotzick et al, 1997;Lambe et al, 2015;Zuberi et al, 2005) or atmospheric simulation chambers (Tritscher et al, 2011;Wittbom et al, 2014;Grimonprez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosols are defined as fine solid particles or liquid droplets suspended in a gas phase. Aerosol particles impact the Earth's radiative budget both directly (e.g., through scattering of shortwave and absorption of shortwave and longwave radiation) (Haywood and Boucher, 2000) and indirectly (e.g., by changing the properties of clouds; Ackerman et al, 2000;Lohmann and Feichter, 2005;Seinfeld et al, 2016;Twomey, 1977). Furthermore, they demonstrate significant impacts on air quality and human health (Anenberg et al, 2012;Janssen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%