2015
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi4042267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud-Based Geospatial 3D Image Spaces—A Powerful Urban Model for the Smart City

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we introduce the concept and an implementation of geospatial 3D image spaces as new type of native urban models. 3D image spaces are based on collections of georeferenced RGB-D imagery. This imagery is typically acquired using multi-view stereo mobile mapping systems capturing dense sequences of street level imagery. Ideally, image depth information is derived using dense image matching. This delivers a very dense depth representation and ensures the spatial and temporal coherence of ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the calibration accuracy has been increased significantly compared to Burkhard et al (2012). Furthermore, in order to generate geospatial 3D images and 3D image spaces (Nebiker et al, 2015) from fisheye stereo images, an image processing workflow was developed according to Abraham & Förstner (2005). We evaluated the accuracies in a challenging urban area in the city centre of Basel using our 360° stereo panorama mobile mapping system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the calibration accuracy has been increased significantly compared to Burkhard et al (2012). Furthermore, in order to generate geospatial 3D images and 3D image spaces (Nebiker et al, 2015) from fisheye stereo images, an image processing workflow was developed according to Abraham & Förstner (2005). We evaluated the accuracies in a challenging urban area in the city centre of Basel using our 360° stereo panorama mobile mapping system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for infrastructure management or urban planning. As suggested by Nebiker et al (2015), a geospatial 3D image consists of a georeferenced RGB image with additional channels supporting depth and quality information, ideally for each pixel. Ideally, 3D images are derived from stereo imagery using dense image matching -in this case from raw equidistant fisheye stereo image pairs -in order to obtain very dense depth representations and to ensure the spatial and temporal coherence of radiometric and depth data.…”
Section: Processing Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we newly set tie point accuracy to 0.3 pixel and defined 0.5 pixel for image observations to ground control points, also sequences acquired in July 2014 were reprocessed which led to slightly different results compared to Cavegn et al (2015) and to Nebiker et al (2015). Overall RMSE values of 0.42-0.89 pixel were computed, 0.15-0.21 pixel for tie points and 0.81-1.08 pixel for ground control points (see Table 5).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bundle Adjustment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for users unfamiliar with point clouds and for complex scanning objects such as indoor environments. In contrast to depth values captured with LiDAR, the depth from dense image matching ensures the spatial and temporal coherence of radiometric and depth data of the 3D imagery (Nebiker et al, 2015). The 3D information can hereby be derived directly from the images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%