2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud Adiabaticity and Its Relationship to Marine Stratocumulus Characteristics Over the Northeast Pacific Ocean

Abstract: Cloud adiabaticity (α) is defined as the ratio of the actual liquid water path (LWPmeasured) in a cloud to its corresponding adiabatic value (LWPad). Processes such as drizzle and entrainment can lead to subadiabatic LWPmeasured. This study examines α and its relationship to microphysical properties for 86 cloud events over the Northeast Pacific Ocean based on data collected during four separate summertime airborne campaigns. For the study region, α was found to be 0.766 ± 0.134. For most cases, clouds with a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
12
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies (Neiburger et al, 1961;Wood and Bretherton, 2004), regardless of whether clearings were present, PBLH generally increases with distance from the coast (Fig. 8d), where warmer SSTs lead to a deeper MBL by weakening the inversion (Bretherton and Wyant, 1997). The shallowing of the MBL near the coast of California is also notable with enhanced gradients on clearing days.…”
Section: Contrasting Clearing and Non-clearing Casessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous studies (Neiburger et al, 1961;Wood and Bretherton, 2004), regardless of whether clearings were present, PBLH generally increases with distance from the coast (Fig. 8d), where warmer SSTs lead to a deeper MBL by weakening the inversion (Bretherton and Wyant, 1997). The shallowing of the MBL near the coast of California is also notable with enhanced gradients on clearing days.…”
Section: Contrasting Clearing and Non-clearing Casessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is important to note that the adiabaticity parameter, defined as the ratio of measured LWP to LWP of an adiabatic cloud, exhibited values of 0.75, 0.76, and 0.83 for RF08, RF09A, and RF09B, respectively. These adiabaticity values are close to the average value of 0.766 for the region reported in Braun et al (2018). The clouds were quite thin near the interface based on the relatively low values of LWP in contrast to typical conditions observed in the region based on airborne measurements in the same campaigns ( Fig.…”
Section: Rf09a and Rf09bsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Adiabaticity is known to change with cloud depth in marine stratocumulus (Merk et al, 2016;Braun et al, 2018). Furthermore, we find that clouds in deep BLs are more likely to precipitate than clouds in shallow BLs (Fig.…”
Section: Covariance Between Cloud Properties and Boundary Layer Depthmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Future analyses of past campaigns summarised in Zuidema et al (2016) will likely increase the data points sampled in deeper BLs. References: Jiang et al (2002), Johnson et al (2004), Lu and Seinfeld (2005), Bretherton et al (2007), Sandu et al (2008), , , Yi et al (2008), Xue et al (2008), Caldwell and Bretherton (2009), Ackerman et al (2009), Sandu et al (2009), Hill and Feingold (2009) 2018, Augstein et al (1973), Lenschow et al (1988), Albrecht et al (1988Albrecht et al ( , 1995, Stevens et al (2003), Bretherton et al (2004), Lu et al (2007Lu et al ( , 2009, and Wood et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary layer height for the coastal California clouds can be extremely shallow (Zuidema et al 2009), with cloud-top heights (CTHs) ranging in these f lights between 135 and 1,150 m, with a mean of 541 m. Cloud depths and liquid water paths (LWPs) ranged between 40 and 760 m and 10 and 310 g m -2 , respectively. Clouds were typically subadiabatic (average adiabaticity = 0.766 ± 0.134; Braun et al 2018). On average, the observed LWC lapse rate tended to be a fairly constant fraction of the adiabatic LWC lapse rate through the bottom 90% by height of the cloud; however, in the top 10% of the cloud, a sharp decrease in LWC was observed [Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%